OCR Text |
Show PROHIBITION IN COLORADO WINS statp M'imu-.mi: court mvi:s iMioitryr ui!isin. Crnt iiiilnl Mnti. nnd All tin CIHcn Tlirrrln IWtiitnp lry After tlio 1'liM of ilip Ycni-Cowrnnr C'itrlon Tt-prowfH Tt-prowfH Ci(.n.i (Irntllmlc When He llenit of ilio l.nto-1 Itullnjt j IIKWMII. t'oto . Dee 6 The nu-thorlU nu-thorlU of Colorado to enact nnd en-1 fore klate wide prohibition Una upheld up-held in the Mate mipreme eourt today to-day in an unatilimmx opinion written by JuMlee W. II (labbert The rourt held that eltlen Kerned tinder tperlal rhaiter were without nuthorlt) to eonllmie tiafflt In IntoxIrMIn II-tiunr II-tiunr after January I. 101ft. when i!nt wide prohibitum become effective effec-tive In Colorado tinder constitutional nnd statutory nartineitt. Tin derlaion held that the enforcement enforce-ment of prohibition rumen under the polln iorw of the etate and l In nu vny affected l.y tlie twentieth amend-' ment under whbh Denver nnd wcrnl I other i lllen In t'olorndn are Koverncdl by upeilal i harter It In uleo declared! that the lonetlluthinal and itatutory1 prohibition enactmrntM are clearl) I within the mwer or the people and i IcKl.lmure or the elate The opinion' look the ixwltl.iii -that If It had been Intended to exempt the rlt nnd count of Denver from the operation ! of piohlhltlnn Iawk. word to that ef-, feet would have lieen emploed The court ordered the lUenne l-mied l-mied b Denver clt) nllthorltlea to! AURiint Koch to be canceled Jnuuar) I. 1918 Cluvernnr Cnrlxon cxprctmed Rrntlflintlon when Informed of the. court a riitlim None of the uttoriicvii for the llipior Intercut wna In court. I Mr Adrlann lluilKerford. prcnldcnl of I tho Mate Women' t'hrlMlun Temper-1 nnec union, exprowed her Krntlflca-1 lion and mid "The only HwHulunre kIvcii Attorne) I (leiu-ial Karinr wna l the Statu Women Wo-men riirl.tUn Temperance union In emploiltiK oiuiiim-I to aid In prenent-Iiik prenent-Iiik the ihw to the mipreme tourt , |