Show WAS GOOD ENOUGH REASON accused mans lawyer asserted his 1 clients innocence Innocenc eSo 30 what Wha was there for jury to do doa the following story either shows e extreme ignorance on ta alie id part barf of ia i juror or if shows what bhail a wonderful charm some lawyers on it jury said a foin former er marshal of n s southern indiana city A murder was waa committed and it was not long before we had the alie man who ho we we were sure had co committed th the deed but lie he had money aidi and lie retained maln ed the best lawyers the two lawyers we w e will call white anti and black lie he cause white and black are not real names maines the jury fury was nude up largely of men who tilled the soil they were of the honest sort white and black especially white so presented cheh clients case telling how h he e coil could ll not ro t do such a horrible bor deed using their handkerchiefs occasionally in the telling that the jarois were carried away and voted cpr I 1 lnier later I 1 met one of the jurors and I 1 said to him jones jdnes why did you vote to acquit the prisoner goner the evidence ilio showed wed clearly that ile he was guilty lity atno no sir that man was not guilty said jones what makes you think got so I 1 coun countered terel wha been because use mr mi white said he be 1 concluded jon jones e 8 1 |