Show LOG CABI aft PRODUCTS on ohp ath ans dinst the he the above mohing companies with kith their A array r of their legal lumm lU iliin aries pres gathered gather ed in 1 n jhb district cour t in n before judge erickson I 1 in a e combat om ever two mining claims jai ms in the great alunite alumpe belt at marysvale Marys vale in 1 1901 dr r franklin the original moving spirlan tn the of min ing gropler properties es thereafter held by the snow bird bid log campi and utah gold mountain C companies Is I 1 a and dij now under lease to the florence M M company engaged pen Bey boolds holds and ji J F price to lo 10 locate certain claims for the use of said franl franklin lin or his hia assigns and upon the landa embraced pm braced in above ie named suit reynolds and price alce i thereupon whereupon located safa saad lands and ana reynolds soon thereafter c conveyed ony ilis his in kerest interest to said franklin or assign grid a nd it has been supposed by succeeding company claimants that price also ha conveyed as di did d R reynolds olds during all ali ill the e year years since their location annual assessment for said claims lias has been performed in past pasi within the bounds bounded sd of same but principally in driving the log cabin and franklin tunnels driven inthe direction of bf and intended for and adapted to the deye development lopa lent of the claims aarm ar jn qu question esio n as part 0 of f a group upon which the portals portal of said tunnels are situate in 1912 and after the identification of the he rich potash bearing alunite ores in the glo of the claims in question the Mine mineral ial products co or its representatives senta tives jumped parts part s of the rey price claims by locating the the custers 29 and 80 claims and thereafter nde made application for patent thereof whereupon the utah I 1 gold mountain co present claimants of th the e commonly called log cabin holdings filed its adverse and the Rich neld suit puit was to deter determine mine ownership of area embraced embi aced in s said d custers 29 and 30 the Ile hearing pring had proceeded somo some days with the appear appearance arree of the gold mountain company establishing its legal title by location locatto in and legal and beneficial assessment ent wark work performed since that date then came the testimony of J F price one of the bri original kinal locators locator oh jha t he ba had never received payment for bis interest ip the original origin pl locations and that he had never conveyed the same to the utah gold mountain company or its it predecessors in interest and th that it he price was then the owner of said interest and in face of the fact tha during some eleven years said price so far as is is known to local off officers iders of the florence and allied companies never made a claim of interest in said original loca tiona and never during said time requested que sted compensation for foi conveyance of any interest and the further fact that after adverse had been filed and upon examination of abstract of title by adverse attorneys the price defect had been discovered mr air price executed and delivered to gold mountain company a deed conveying his interest without demand or br request for consideration or compensation which deed was ruled out by the court as comi coming ng too late to ture cure defect in gold Mount mountain aln title the law being well settled that to perform assessment work on one min be e shown th that atall all the claims are owned in in common or by the same parties and the proof in th this s case showing that price owned in same but not all of the group I 1 worked principally from the log cabin and tunnels there appeared a acid i technical defect in br gold mountain company compan legal title and because thereof and not because of insufficient assessment work a compromise was effected whereby the go gold ld lemountain mountain co secures the northerly one halland half and the A mineral products company the southerly one half af 0 f 7 the austers ousters 29 and 80 30 the compromise leaves both great companies companies I 1 free to pursue the even tenor of of their respective way andi and iiii insures to the benefit of 17 the camp in free fre e action and unclouded title and as the ground in conflict was va riot not M material to either corn com banys great alunite assets perhaps the compromise is basfor best for eief everybody and we hope that mutual respect for right and justice will in all the 6 future prevail in Marys vales mining activities to the end that we have the best and greatest camp in utah |