Show court ends long ter term M on thursday afternoon the may term of the district court came to an end here thursday afternoon following a long session which started on monday of 1 last ast week with many cases being disposed of during th that at time three bt which were jury trials the first of these that of the state slate of utah vs leroy A wilson and leland willis wads was reported in the last issue of this paper with the exception of the judges decision which was to have been given on tuesday when the defendants came up for sentence their attorney moved for a new trial with the request that sentence not be passed until after the motion was considered this request was granted over the protest of district attorney euis ellis pickett and the new trial was set for junn june at 10 a m the defendants bail was raised to each in the trial of the case of clifford P vs wilson N lunt et al which followed the wilson case in which the defendants were charged with misrepresentation in selling a car to the plaintiff a jury brought in a verdict of no cause for action following a trial lasting three days the jury was composed of frank armstrong john P orton carlos jones mary R bentley euis ellis robinson heber harrison wm win davenport and henry houchen the case of kay vs maeser dalley dailey et al also involving a car contract was tried next before a jury consisting of edwin webb frank franklin williamson john booth royce K knight silas I 1 E riddle and john H parry after spending a day or two trying the case the parties got together and settled settle d it out of court and the case was dismissed at the stipulation of both parties the opening day of the ses hsioh stanley stahley mcknight appeared and was excused from reporting any more as long as he remits to the clerk of the court 10 a month to be pa paid id to mildred G dalley dailey in the ca case se of frank londo vs la monte lo 10 lowe we evidence in the case had partially been given before and other were sworn and testified at this time and the judge took the case under advisement and it was stipulated that the court might made his findings in chambers any where in the district the case of P A clark vs the summit irrigation company was set for trial on sept 15 1942 and the case of B D vs cedar city corp was set for trial on june 15 1942 several divorce cases were disposed of along with some probate matters before the adjournment |