Show el act court holds 11 sess session ion here e leday le e day IK t filth ju judicial acial district court IL i three day session here dur e fore part or 01 the week with tt will L hoyt on the bench eveian cal prominent attorneys in lance fice ye requiring most of the ulia Z leigh tj ji u vs douglas dark clark ese ase was over a dispute to title ids ds purchased in 1940 by dark clark iron county after said lands leen ri taken over by the county olin elin quent taxes and sold to he plaintiff held that the tax iven by the county for the legal due to faulty tax tore ure the history of the case summed up is about as fol Z 1926 the taxes on two tracts of in question paid and 27 the taxes on the third tract I 1 delinquent in 1931 the first facts acts came up for sale at the i tax sale and were bought in e county in 1932 the remain V act was sold to the county at tay ay tax sale of that ahat year bet L the time the county took the J or taxes and the t time ime it wa 0 to dark clark it had been deasea with no complaint from the iff after dark clark had land nothing was done about il 1 a few months ago and after reath ath of J david leigh the 1 owner when a complaint aided lied by the administratrix x iu 10 possession of the lands court allowed allowed her claim stat hat at the defendants plea of erse possession must fail and he e defense based on estival or s also must fail since it is adi that the tax procedure is hors note the procedure cheit roved faulty is this the state ture iture in passing the law gov the may tax sale stipulated e law that before the sale the lust t be published for four cone con we ive weeks the court in this allowed that actually only 27 had elapsed between the first fourth publication instead of enquired 28 days since then the las been amended to read that ration cation shall be made in foai autive issues wo divorces were granted by ourt court during the session one na a B heaton from glenn hea in which the plaintiff was led d custody of two minor child and property settlement and I 1 ony was granted in accordance t an agreement between the partin in the action the second wa was ted to mary alice B casteel 1 victor H casteel ite lie e case of frank londo vs late lowe was continued to a date because one of the ma I 1 witnesses in the case was un to be present my other civil cases came bethe court but were set for trial later ater date or dis dismissed dismissed or conid for the term the next ses of the court will be on may 16 aam a m |