Show COURT ADJOURNS TO SALT LAKE because there was not available in this county sufficient law tor for the proper presenting and decision of 0 a case before the court an adjournment mel to salt lake city was taken the last ot of the week after several criminal and civil cases had been 1 31 di disposed loosed ot of or continued for the term here the case which made the change in place ot of trial necessary was that or of forbes vs butler which was sent back from the supreme court to judge bartza burto n for an accounting of the defendent de it involves some very nice questions on partnerships al and the relation ot of individual partners and there was insufficient law and court decisions on the subject here one day was spent on the case here which brought about some very embarrassing barr assing situations one tor for instance occurred when the court ruled that a witness should answer a certain question and the counsel advised him not to and he refused had tho the court been certain ot of its ground both the witness and counsel were in contempt ot of court and could have been thrown in jail but the court was uncertain and therefore insist the attorneys not interested in tile the case but who were present sensed the situation and sank bank down in their collars lu in embarrassment ras E A walton and judge A n R barnes prominent salt lake attorneys atto ineys were representing the respective spec tive parties trial of the case of 0 the state vs ollie norris which was in progress as we went to press last week resulted in a hung jury three of 0 tile the jurors bei being ng for acquittal and five tor for conviction which will necessitate a retrial re trial of the ease case probably at the il next at term the jurors in the case were alonzo christensen william williams thomas A thorley R N lund chas F huiet jos 13 daltou dalton edgar benson and W A evans that they should have disagreed in the case was rather a surprise to those who heard the case even defendants attorneys it Is understood admitted when the jury retired that they would return a verdict tor for the state denied a new trial after he had been sentenced to not to exceed five years in the state stale penitentiary orton convicted earlier in the week filed notice 0 of appeal and gave bonds lu in the sum 0 of 1000 as security pending action on the appeal the jury which rendered the verdict in his case consisted of mayhew dalley john 11 II corry joseph H 1 1 lund arthur gardner john P dalley dailey thomas K holyoak fernleigh Fernl elgh gardner and J S P barton the case of the state vs lu lit nelson was dismissed on oil motion of the district attorney and the suspension of sentence in the case against millard nelson was continued tor for another time with the provision that the defendent write the court each month as to his hig conduct and whereabouts in the suit against ollie norris and E F bennett as bondsmen for one hendershot judgement jud gement was waa ren 1 f dered against them for or the amount of the bond together wath 40 interest and 1320 costs cosla motion jor for new trial in the case of day against bayles was denied and the case caselt ot of revoe eyre Ys vs martel eyre for or divorce was dismissed on plaintiffs motion A T lawrence was given judge ment for or 1636 and interest and costs against H 11 II wilkinson the intermountain association ot of credit men took judgement jud gement against E E sprague for or with interests and costs ella datty batty burnham was given interlocutory decree of 0 divorce against eugene burnham Cur nham with custody of minor child 25 a month alimony 50 attorneys tee fee and 50 suit nto money ney and ellery patterson was awarded interlocutory dechee decree ot of divorce against carrie bells belle patterson to become final in six months some other civil and probate matters were also disposed ot of during the term here in addition to what were reported last week and still others were continued on until next term |