Show WHY THE VERDICT an extract from judge knobs instructions to the jury iu in kelsey case tried recently at st george as reported in the washington county new tends in a measure to explain the a tion of the jury in bringing in a diet dict ot of not guilty th tract follows f I 1 this case if yon should find and belt beli ve from the evi evidence denge beyond a rea readi t liable doubt that arsenic was found in tho body of the deceased lottie ke aboy an lat she died as A a yi rt atit duj poisoning it would be your duty nevertheless to acquit the defendent defendant unless you ou i mould bould further fine and believe from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant administered said itt arsenic to her and that he be dil so with the specific intent of wilfully and feloniously with premeditated malice aforethought of killing tier her and unless this is proven to your satisfaction beyond all reasonable doubt then you must acquit the defendant 0 no evidence has been offered or received in this ca case se from which you will be warranted in finding that the de defendant ever ai at any time or place p possessed oss essed arsenic or that he knew of its use purpose or its deadly ous effect and before you would bf be warranted wan anted in convicting the defendant the state would have to prove to your satisfaction that the defendant did possess arsenic and that he actually aall caused it to be administered to the deceased lottie kelsy for the durpos ot taking her life |