Show by a ouster doctor A acedo medical man in k oeta 1 alzen tily ls fr cd budapest 3 recently charged g 6 5 0 0 cowna present value ea but pur be e ing value 1 II in A tillage mass about is 8 be or R n dingle visit to a patient who lived not at tw far fuwa ithe doctor declines TW 1 I dence this patient sued aued the doctor tor for profiteering but the t b a court di daw missed misled the man case the auld plaintiff appealed however to IS ft high higher court art gave judgment against the doctor docto to on an the ground that the demand ing of at ao an exorbitant tee fee for hamd ices um waa to be re gardill as ai profiteering and egg therefore illegal it we trall decided that mental to la could fairly be considered as 1 IB filch ell earn cases we no except exception ime could old be made concerning doctors declare for although the inna latter did not ace tell technically 11 receive wit wages their ser services leare eme came within the accepted meaning of work |