Show DISTRICT COURT DOINGS DOING the regular ada turned april term of at the district court of the fifth judicial 1 I 1 district of the state of utah convened in the court house at paroman monday may 13 1918 the following cases cams on the calendar were taken up and disposed bollow of as lol follows low state of utah vs va elias leigh jury was and case tried verdict of not guilty returned by the jury defendant was waa discharged and it his bond released state of utah vs us joseph E W waters a the court entered on an a order der deor rul the cae and defendant tend out was discharged upon open the filing of a statement b bv the denot At attorney torner of beasma of taw law and t r ct t for mail in to diamia the action a celar city vs ve samuel boil for mide neanor appealed from justice court was continued for the term state of utah vs william F saw yer charged will grand larceny defendant found guilty and on re que quest u t of counsel an granted 60 daya day to in which to file motion far fora a as new trial date dat for fir passing sentence set act for farat day of next term of court in this his county september state of utah vs otto for arg furgeri ry order entered cism mg defendant state of utah vs melvin petty charged with forgery case dismissed missed state of utah ulan vs a rochie de miff charged with forgery case dis dia I 1 parowan city vs va L burcon et el of al case continued for term CIVIL CASES lura L clifton vs va charles P clifton action for divorce order entered unreeling ann marriage vow bowa rod and property dit disposed posed of by stipulation bankers trust company vs nevada consolidated minea company decree entered favor of plaintiff by stipulation J david leigh vs vii george T tullis act action on a account judgment entered efured favor of plaintiff alfred froyd vs es M E trimmer action on PrO promissory memory note judgment entered bisor of plaintiff C C bladen vs us Z drake of ft a action oo do ardin ary note judgment entered for far plaintiff jessie cosslett vs gomer gainer D costs coss lett action lor devorce devalue decree entered granting annulment of marriage vows otto L miller ys vs mary E miller action for far divorce decree entered tor for plaintiff id ida 9 va john Vt chel is a tion for decree bonal me ma To taace mar aCe enteric entered g mfg mag C co vi eh W H delity alln a el el i ac nn un on aoe judgment lavor favor ot at plaintiff |