Show NO C CALENDAR LENDAR FOR YEARS Christians Reckoned Time Ac According I to Customs Customs' of Nations to Which I They Belonged I tells us that for tur WM lolO years tIlt the hn had Imd no calendar of or their ow 11 0 own li but reckoned rl the years according i I to tn the 11 cu of the 1111 nations to which they belonged 1 ed The rhe Ullman ni I I u used ed the tilt Anno unu or year 11 r of the 1111 founding U lit of f t. t t count from others ethers ti counted from the reign i of or I calling It the lime Para Bra orI of or 1 I th Martyrs t lI and still 1111 others used the calendar of III Iba Cupid Copt of tit Egypt In the time I sixth century Denis the a 11 reek lIIk monk 11 Iii III lug In lit made HUHle a u calendar counting from rum the lla the till unit date of ot which h he lit at Bt 7 3 A A. A U. U C C. So we WI commonly 1 say wiy 11 that Route Hume 11 was aay 1 I I founded 71 11 It I. I O. O I 1 At tt t the ibe Ih tit the lilt eighth century cen cen- i tury till the le pointed lInt ant that this ills wag an r. lint Hut Ho nn general MIS taken of Ids his criticism cud and the till error has ned ved to this Ihli day II facts enabled to determine of doubt the without mud JI possibility exact year ar of ot be 1111 birth of ot letus anti and to In place It at lit whit what we Wit call 5 Ii 15 n. CIt CIt C. C It Ii I. I bt be noted II says s S the U. U great groat llo Frem rh ell astronomer non HUM that lint flat tho hi birth of ot Sin Savior u lor rt re re- totally unperceived at lit the tin time line No register of or birth h no lit contemporary historian lias hus us UI is Int any ay JoIn 1111 I parchment the event er i. i 1111 bough h we lie hurt arc actually I 11 the tho year A A. A 1 there thorA 1 U iii 1 HUlit 11 probability that our calendar will till tt II titer 4 r I. I be reformed to fb the ht fact tact fit The of lit dates that Hlat would rut r rt suit null from remit a II of ot the lie curate would bo but too inn great greut to tu anch worth worthwhile while while CIc Plain H |