| Show FIXES according to a decision rendered by the district court yesterday a number of boundary lines of property along south wall avenue aa at present located are incorrect and while there has in the past boon considerable dispute in regard to this matter duo to two surveys which did not agree the ruling of the court has established certain points 0 reference whereby a settlement can bo made the ruling was mada in tho case of james M russell la barcella luchey and others which involves the boundary of property located near the corner of twenty sixth street and wall avenue before beginning the litigation attorneys hey wood and mccormack McCorm lck established a boundary without regard two surveys that th confusion by referring ito some of the old 2 at landmarks in that vicinity and tailing an independent ll 11 ne in this they were upheld by the courts decision and the settlement of the case will probably have much to do towards settling several like con in that vicinity in accordance cor dance with iho ruling an injunction has been issued the defendants in the case from asserting any claim to the land as described in the complaint and from interfering with the boundary as established |