Show AGAINST T DM OGDEN CITY 2 the sidewalk ordinance to be tested 1 I sa mrs hannah carroll LCarroll su and secures a Ref restraining training order to prevent sale or property on sidewalk repair rodair delinquency yesterday afternoon 0 0 richards und and A E piatt pratt attorneys for or hannah Carroll brought suit shit in the secord district court against oiled ogden city cotest to test an ordinance under which a large number ot of pieces of property proD erty are advertised for or sale oa ou account ol 01 ti dewalk repair de the snit suit involves quite a earn sum ot of money which has been expended by the street supervisor jn in repairing rep airine certain sidewalks Bide wilke the folio a ing business was bad had and done in the second district court yester v day judge presiding loe in case ot of john ohara ve vs oregon short line ana atia receivers rece ivere of U poty all of defendants petitioner petition eKl to have cape removed to federal coart the petition wad resisted by plaintiffs and argued submit submitter teJ and liken under ad 0 91 i t in case catte of utah loin trust company VB vs alma D treasurer trea eure county attorney peery for defendant appeared and asked leave to withdraw demurrer which wee was ordered and it was aleo also ordered that defendant have ten davs in which to answer in n the case a hannah carroll vs R A moye treasurer oden city it was ordered that an order to show cause and Z a il temporary restraining restrain ine order issue upon plaintiffs giving rood good bond in sum of aw the case waa was filed yesterday and plain till albeke that eho she is owner of certain lots in oden ogden that tinder an in ordinance passed december 1 1896 to sidewalks etc that plaintiff had bad been or ori lerea ferea tc improve and repair sidewalks walka in front of property that she failed to make euch such improvements and that the street supervisor of ogden city maje made such improvement in aurea a nee of 61 the provisions of each such ordinance and tendered a lua 11 of lq IA that I 1 M onike payment of same to eaid said bogde n city c s Tand and that there is 13 now published in a list for sale br bir the city treasurer the property owned hy by said 1 hannah carroll Oar roll an andeel et for bale sale the thild monday in december that the treasurer threatens to coaell biell said prop erty for or eaid aid delinquencies in payment for improvements and thereby caste casts a cloud upon the title of plaintiff where tore fore plaintiff asks that eaid said ordinance be adjudged null mull and void and proceedings proceed ince auken b by said city be declared null and TJ vf and n that a restraining order issue to devent I 1 vent su such ch ale tale as advertised 0 0 richards and A E pratt are attorneys attorn eye for plaintiff the case of john mannine manning et al v john fife et al occupied the balance of the day in court the evidence is all in and the arguments of attorn began last night they will probably be con eluded tonight ton ht 1 in case 91 of camei P snodgrass et al it vo va the pioneer electric power company defendants were granted to and including december octh in which to V pl plead ead |