Show THE injunction FILED praying that the council be restrained on the paving ordinance the long expected injunction against the paving a v ing of twenty fifth filth street with utah Bands tono blocks block s has been filed at last yesterday H H hend read erson and henderson and brown representing the protestors protesters prot estors carved served a copy of the complaint signed by J 0 armstrong john broom J 11 II spargo william driver H L griffin william 11 chapman and george W murphy upon each member of the city council the time for the bearing has not been set the complaint beta sets forth that on an marchl E 11 II peery and sixty eight others sled filed a protest against the paving of twenty fifth street notwithstanding which and without riving giving doe dae notice as an required by law the following resolution was adopted resolved that the city proceed as speedily aa as possibly to the paving of the twenty fifth street district with utah sandstone blocks that the city cari engineer neer be instructed to prepare the necessary specifications at once and submit the same at the next meeting of the council that the competition for said work bo b or restricted 0 strict ed to bona fide residents of and that EO to far an afi possible only ogden labor be employed in the per performance performa forma ace of the work embodied in the complaint are copies of the various protests and resolutions on the sub jact ai ag well wall ns as A list of the property owners with a description of the protesting airout front feet in section ten the complainants say the city council has under advisement an ordinance providing for an assessment of the property on the street for the purpose of defraying the expenses to be incurred in paving and unless the injunction is granted said ordinance will be passed I 1 thus forcing u upon 0 n the people a pavement which they do T not desire the tile statement is also made that the notices of intention published under direction of the council did not conform with the statute in that they were indefinite and uncertain in and did not state whether the street would be paved or macadam iced or if paved what kind of material would be used that the lands to be affected wera not described that no provision was made for the bearing hearing of other than in writing abat 1 the coet coat could not be properly estimated without designating the material to be need and that many other property owners would have protested te a 1 ll 11 d had they not understood that tuo the 1 choice h 1 l i e of pavement would be left to the people in the last section the assertion is made that there is only one firm in ogden engaged in putting down stone pavements and that competition would therefore necessarily be restricted that many outside contractors contract ora would enter the field if the bidding was not limited to bonafide bona bons fide residents of ogden and might materially reduce the cost of pavement to the property owners the petitioners petition ers pray for an injunction simply to prevent innumerable suits which may be planted |