Show AUAS ALIAS SUMMONS in the district cou court rt of the first judicial district of 0 the territory ol 01 utah weber u Z r n t s 1 h stevens PlaInt lir vs W W 1 funge phebe C funge 1 D giua ashby by alayne and nd the utah loan trust company a c corporation 0 r p a defendants the h n people p 1 r ot f t the b 0 territory of 0 utah end send greeting to W W lue phebe C floge F D mn drha tru ashby maine and the V utah t a h f loan b trust company Compa corpora corporation t a delenda delen danti lolare you are hereby e b required ird to appear P e i in an all action bro brought u g h 1 yag against no you by b the above name named d in the D rou e t cou court toft of the b first judicial district of the territory ol 01 da ua utah h a and d to answer new e r the a ca complaint re 1 I oryl ellel ed therein in w within ten on d daya ity elua exclusive elu 1 v 0 f th the e d day y ot of s er ric V after the service on y you ou 0 of t this h gnu m m foer ved within this coun county or I 1 if f served out of ol ebli I 1 county ty hot ut I 1 in this ebli district within t twenty enty day days otherwise wa within lt forty 0 ay iy doy bayor a or iu judgment dj n ard by ly d default ia 1 will V be taken en against you according 0 to 1 the h pr prayer of so 1 d complaint ager the e cald sad action e is brought to tore fore cloa cloie a certain mortgage 0 on n certain mortgaged p demises remises for the sum of with interest at the rate of ten toll per e ce cent n per annum n um 1 from the n art d day y of P december de c m b 1890 9 0 to together em er with to 0 attorn o cr a teci lees for or the collect collection lon of aid note anela an and f for co costs fo of f suit ul which be aid mortgage wa given to tecaro anu the payment of a certain n promissory note made by the deen defendant dan diw 1 rungs anda and phebe hebe C ae futh F funge ana d delivered 1 ato to the utah lafan tr comps company d defendant fend binl ib that lua the ho utah loan man A t trust truzy for or value assigned I 1 d transferred the said note to thi this e plaintiff t that hat the usual decree decres im may bo m made a d 0 tor ort the he ale a said pem e to the itria lam w and th afe practice fee of tb 1 or court our that the iro ceede 0 of are ald said sale le in may a y be a applied mi ed in pay ent of the amount d us the 1 1 aud lb that at the laid said plaintiff m may have a v judgment e and execution against th the aid df defendants n i an in WW W W funge and I 1 fun funge 10 tor any deficient deficiency cien agg that may remain after applying ying all the proxceda proc ceda 5 of the bale sale of eat ald premises aises that the 0 ran r other party valor to the sult nay may become purchase at jad that the officer or the pert person on directed by this court to 0 o make m eke such sale execute a deed to the h e purchaser that tt the 0 said d p purchaser r be t I 1 let t into nto puch li of t t the ha p ani T se B antho on the production of such deed tb thereof erf lor further and full uller par particulars reference 1 lg hereby made to the complaint p ill on oil file herein and to d you are hr h hereby r iby notified that if you noth yi fall il to 0 appear and da answer now the gald aid 0 complaint o 1 t as i abe above apra required e band t the tad plaintiff wilt r ap kiy jy to the fie court tor for the relief demanded rh therein e rein fitness so the lion iron jame james A bliner edgert judge and the heal geal of the t court ou of the fir firt fiill aai cfall district in and tor for tb the e teri ter tilori 0 0 U utah a lal bill d day of A april april t in the year r of 01 our lord yo one thousand eight handsel aad and ninety one C 11 MCCLURE C clerk lerk richards richard barton attys att TI tor for |