| Show A FIGHT FOR GREAT MS I 1 I 1 I 1 dealers in steaks are the litigants FINE WORK OF THE BIG THREE fourteen smaller ones take a late hand something like twenty five million dollars Is the figure in I 1 the suits nm Y ORK dec 19 the old union if stock yards company caffa chit ago vias bought out early in fit iao 18 by li ngah promoters known a the city of london cor that company purchasing shares til inre 0 or flock stock aggregating gre gating par val tite pin imn ing ier for them something ethin g in ex ce soffia of rhe company then re organ iced under the laws la of 01 new jersey having boll a capital altal stock tok and outstanding inor mortgage g bonds a aggregating OW since then fi wic it has hai been in lit much trouble trouble the public subscribed ery very sparingly it Is i aid and arid t the lie underwriter underwriters were load edwith securities ties armour w aft and morns know known n as ai the ilig aig three were heavy holders in fit old company and end sold out to die the ing ID 11 1 syndicate at per share no the new company an accomplished fact than titan the lug three being no longer interested in fit the divid ll 8 awoke woke to the fact that they were ft ere paying pa ill excess e rate rates for yardage leed le etc in ili consequence they bought 4 acrea acres of land at tolleston Tol 11 leston Indi indiana and and zid announced antoum ed that they poad to remove to that fallt point furthermore ru they pur rit chadd t three tree acres contiguous to tau thair r packing houses in chicago and shortly after filed suits there to compel bhora lie block yard t to permit to bo be delivered over its it tr track direct t live in e stock consigned bothem to them without handling by the stock larda yards company fill a diew to avoiding I 1 paving pa in yardage etc shenew the New ew jersey company compa nv will liabilities it the dilemma of loring loing the lie aig big uig Tb three bu ardi or dividing i fill them part of the income the latter bourse was pursued and the company made a contract with the fiig big vav three bg by b which in effect the latter t deeded t ity lie ea stock yards compa companie nir their three acres at tit the bards ard said to b be worth 50 1000 acres ai re 11 said to have cost 1 di missel he the suits and continued coni thill I 1 1 baine bu ine ineil at the old yards ards for all alili the new jersey company agreed to eay pay bond partly in tit cash and partly in no sooner www this hi agreement made than sir mr ellerman Ell ergan of london andona a stockholder tock holder in fit the company filed a bill a against the new jerkey compana and arid big three for the p e of baving ing the contract 1 out rait declared illegal the vice chancellor in fit new J ersey yesterday decided lit in favor of the legality the he contract today to day lay to fourteen u arteen new flew were cd e d sonie in the united bourt ourt and arid others oUi erin fit tire new jersey court the tire new include all odthe of the packers of the carls verd except thac gitig 1 arce and heir their luane Luri nean i is 4 paid f aggregate over annually ali n app application I 1 for an air in injunction to ii ent the lie carr carrying ing out of the function W ax on trait wa vas A made to chancellor matlill cill ors ot cw ew jersey this thi morning and arid at noon today to du day y he be en au an ell ng K order atlie part parties e to t the is con tract from consummating it i tho the in 1 was served upon like new jersey jerney at once I 1 the he new suit suits make startling allegations llie the allege that the tile ini ergan guiti suit was co collus jul ue v e and arid filed by one in fit close business the london contract corporation that it wan was brought really to liae the contract sustained euta ined that htwa ai n de to suppress pre the truth that the tile contract is a mere inere alleg illegal a at device to create prohibited anat iii alion contrary to t the tie espres statute of I 1 llin new jerrey jersey and the united state states shenew alic new jer jersey aey company fly Is 14 vigorously nt tit ackel tacked ae 81 b being in I 1 a trust and combination and an all unlawful entity organized to deal in the stock of another company a practice frowned upon in the recent trust decision of various 1 courts |
