| Show FIRST DISTRICT COURT the calendar greatly reduced by lly yesterdays ter days work am IUT IDUS EmT several cases dismissed berault petered by defendants lo 10 various 1 busy and d satisfactory scalon session the following bubines a T was la transacted in the first district distri ct ca court art yesterday in the case ol 01 the manhattan trust company vs the ogden allot hot springs railway A health kesort resort company the trial was con concluded clad pd order was entered for decree ol 01 foreclosure 0 according ordin g to the findings of facts and conclusions of law on file fits in the case in the case of the utah national B bank ank of ogden vs A 0 fisk et al A it heywood entered hie bis appear for dependants defendants A 11 II nelson florence nelson and F J cannon Canno nand and by consent of kimball and allison took until october I 1 ast 1st at for time to plead plad e the cage case of farcetta Gar cetta verge vs geo W 31 verge was dismissed in ahe the case of laura A price vs john E price motion for decree was submitted and taken under advise moot went in tha the case cage of stephen gould vs E A reed motion for judgment on pleadings was submitted and taken under advisement the case of thomas young vs martha young referred to J M combs to take testimony the case of susan jane frada Frad bradshaw shaw h aw vs claudius bradshaw Frad shaw was referred toj M combs to take testimony in the case of the utah national nations I 1 bank vs robert robinson et al the motion to strike out parts of complaint and demurrer to complaint was a argued r ga e d submitted and taken under advisement vi in the case of moroni skeen et at 1 al I vs joseph mooney et at al an order was entered granting defendants until oct to prepare and serve statement on motion for new now trial in the case of ralph P hunter vs george W lashus the motion tor for rehearing on motion to dismiss was argued and taken under advisement in the case of james A calvert vs va the al E church et at al the mo motion tion to strike out amended complaint was 11 submitted and taken under advisement in the case of the united states trust company vs L al M L lach h et at al the demurrer to complaint awas was submitted and taken under advisement in the case of A Y mowery A vs joseph dark clark the motion for rehearing on order allowing execution was submitted and taken under advisement in the case of george H 11 tribe vs A L hobson et al the motion for new trial was submitted and taken under adv advisement 1 bement in the case ease of A 11 II nelson vs james calsin the motion to file supplemental plem answer was submitted and taken under advisement in the case of george 11 II horton vs emma horton the mot motion on tor for change n of f venue venne was denied on the offer of plaintiff to pay the expenses of defendants fend ants witnesses to O ogden oden den order was entered that plaintiff pay the money into court in the case of 0 W brooks vs elizabeth elizaboth hughes the motion to strike out answer was overruled in the case of george H tribe vs A L hobson et at al al motion was made to strike out amended complaint order was entered striking out oat the motion n in the case of the utah national bank vs A 0 fisk et al the motion of d defendant e to quash return of summons 0 n 11 was submitted and taken under advisement viso vi ment it la the case of jones at lewis vs 0 osborne Oa borne jr the motion to discharge dischar ge attachment was submitted and taken under advisement in re the estate of mark bigler the m motion fotion to dismiss the appeal was submitted and taken under advisement in the case of 11 II 11 II christensen vs 0 0 love loveland and the motion to costs was wag submitted and taken under advisement antho in the case of hans voight it vs A 11 II nelson demurrer to the complaint was submitted and taken under ad via ement ent Inthe in the case of the jarecki Jareck lAfa manufacturing fac turing company vs the utah gas as company the motion for judgment on pleadings was submitted and taken under advisement in the case of 11 II II 11 curtis vs the ogden A hot springs hallwa railway I 1 A health resort company the ra motion 7 tio of plaintiff for new trial was submitted and taken under advisement in the case of the denver fish company vs 11 II L griffin order was entered requiring defendants attorneys to furnish plaintiffs attorney with certain papers before september in the case of the ogden state bank top A 11 II franklin et al the motion for judgment on pleadings was submitted aud and taken under ad advisement vi in the case of newman brothers vs F W clark order was entered allowing defendant to be brought to ogden from fr the penitentiary to attend the trial provided he paid the expenses of the trip the case of chapman sk strong vs A 11 II dickson was dismissed at plaintiffs cost in the case of 0 E sawtelle vs T J edwards tho the demurrer to complaint was confessed for the plaintiff plaintiffs and ad plaintiff wai granted ten day to file an amended complaint the case of george laagus vs J M dae was continued tor for the term I 1 the case of ogden city vs II 11 A wells was continued for the term in the case of wills H booth jr vs the bear lake at river water I 1 works irrigation company the motion to dismiss the appeal wag was submitted and taken under advis advisement omen t in the case of mary et al vs george J marsh et al the demurrer to amended complaint was submitted and taken under advisement in the case of henry W harris vs A L nichols et al order was entered I 1 allowing allowing the complaint to be amended by inserting insetting the names of james n thompson 0 s 0 n and 11 d john christensen aa as de defendants f e ta n is in the case of M II 11 jonea jones vs davia davis order was entered allowing complaint to be amended by ad adding ding the name ol 01 A E snow as defendant in the case cage of 0 G snow vs H HU HH H christensen default of defendant waa was entered also order granting decree tor for MO with interest at 13 48 abdat and attorney fee at ten per cent and cost coat of ba salt I 1 t in the case 0 of I 1 H W harris vs A L nichola nichols et al default of defendants was entered as well as order for judgment mentin in attorney fees at 35 and coat cost of suit in the case of 11 II W harris vs nii christensen default of defendant was entered as well as order for judgment and decree of foreclosure foie closure for with 50 attorney fees and coat cost of suit in the case of Brig brigham bant city M 31 A 51 A vs lysander onetis default of defendant was entered with order tor for judgment for as well as interest attorneys tees fees and cost of suit abec the case it a go of W N stephens vs J G moyes et al al was continued until monday september the case of W G young vs W 11 II booth jr was dismissed at the cost 0 of f the plaintiff |
