Show first district court in the case of frank monroe vs N K R strang et at al order entered allowing complaint la in intervention to be entered S 0 C peterson reter Boa was arral arraigned 1 e don on the char charge of unlawful co cohabitation hati t atlon to which hig he pleaded not guilty the case of A W coates et al VB vs farr broa bros was continued for or the term in the case of F R alien allen vs the union pacific rail railway company y order entered contin WY tl 13 compau 9 and striking etri kine from rona the betting setting I 1 the case of edward hobart vs sophia hobart obart ll euit suit for divorce was referred to J S painter to take lee testimony in the tile case cage of robert hawthorne vs philip Pu reser order continuing and striking from betting getting the tho case of geo gen il 11 tribe va vs A L hobson et al wan was called for trial it was somewhat soma what complicated hobson and wilkinson lkinson Wl bad had guaranteed the account of a bab ur named harkins at plain store harking harkins bad had guaranteed another roan man earned tamed cochran w who ho took harking harkins boarding house lie left and mr tribe sued the contractors contract ora for the bill something Bome lhing like the jury jary brought in a verdict at of jao mo cause lor for action A horse and a cart furnia tarnished bodan an amuel amusing ran runaway u up twenty fourth street hill I 1 yesterday afternoon |