Show FIRST DISTRICT COURT marl mark Lin lindsay asay sf of I 1 fill cohabitation the following business business was transacted a ted in the first district dial act court yesterday january fth the case of the united states va vs mark lindsay was placed on inal trial mr D evans prosecuted and km ball and allison appe appear atel eJ for the defense f enbe the following jury were empanel I 1 ed geo burrows E N williams adam bandure Ban ales alex B nielsen B 0 walton Walton jr edwin sewell john juhn John sod soo edward ryan J p T cottrell william sharp and cam james ma walton mr lindsay hai bai been acquitted of this charge once on the ruling that the offense was committed in this district while the first wife resided in another district this ruling having been changed by the supreme court making it an offence to cohabit with the plural wife according aa ace to the rulings of the court vi while hie the first wife was alive no matter in what precinct L tha ha lived defendant had been rear re ar rested that he had live livid d with the plural wife was proven and under the rulings of the suyeme court the jury were under the necessity of bringing in a virdi ct of guilty sentence was deferred until the may term in the tile cae of alma Shosho vs francis E campb sll et al at an order enar d overruling the motion for a new now trial A A bright of Tenn tennessee esNe was admitted to the practice of law at this bir in the case of 11 II biel v vs A first distilling Did Dia tilling company an order was eu entered dismissing the appeal on motion of J N kimball attA attorney urney for defendant and appellant in the case of sophia ernisten Arn isten VB vs peter pter e arnsten an order waa was catered for decree of divorce |