Show I 1 as N bocal LINIES 6 I 1 pro re SS of the it irk 4 hall trial 1 k LAW CONF hencel I 1 of il reform school builders Build erb em denials t APOSTLE LYMAN IN aa Is ak I 1 QI outrage adly lif in I 1 TOES I 1 bill fit ninny amateio ilig joli the reform achl comma lion fee court I 1 1 FIRST DISTRICT COURT proceedings in the hall case atil sentenced 4 burt opened yesterday december I 1 at 10 am the hill cam wag resumed and john recalled who continued his testimony as follows bybee and Hall were rod spart when they began to t alk each man picked up life hat after the conflict was over the y ath on about three feet part upon crom exam by air kimball wit i that dilall had caien to his knees I 1 and that willi ni W bybee wag striking him on athe back of the head I 1 while in that position th a deceased was directly behind the defendant at the time of the kim witness was about a rod away at ilia time frank clark was the next witness ile testified that lie was twenty seven ears old and lived in og ip n know T illiam 31 bybee in his litel line was his cousin had known the defendant about seven years he sa bybee af ter the affair was over so saw hall about two or after asked him if it was true that he had stabbed bybee defendant said it was and showed the knife with which the stab bing was done hall told the witness that the first time he struck he was on his knees and did not believe I 1 it hurt bibee but the next time he was on his feet and that last blow hurt him the witness was shown the knife and identified I 1 91 flail said stabbed bybee and would own ceased j a I 1 lousy 8 u cl abhi td then bybee struck him had exam aued head and found one lump died about three wed neadly at the house of J 31 clark cross examined t heard of the dif faculty about two bclark TC lark called at halls house to I 1 tell him to go to C C richards office I 1 that evening ahen the conversation took place defendant was standing on the ground and witness was on his stated this same story before I 1 the grand ury hall told witness that he would t a it again bedei the same circumstances did not examine th lump carefully but thought it wa about the size of a walnut eherd might have been other lumps but wit us did not feel then saw no marks or bruises on defendi ats face did 1 not know why he had not peen a it 1 ness in iba ca before it ag not because he did not facts mr hall said he wan on his knees an a back defendant told him that t ilia first time be bomek he was on his gum and the second timi he was on bs feet hall did not tell fill that be wason bis bands and knees and a track his left arm ids brother jam T clark bad not derailed tha occurrence to him dr U 4 powers ana testified that he was a physician and eop bad had considerable ex in the examination of X babe a slut was billed hain lontin bilu resting over a chair and sufferer fr 9 SWO wounds in the chii pointed u on jr H iles per sol about V here the wounds were 8 was it little to the and the other a little to the left were two or three laches the witness was sho wu the knifed and I 1 staid the wounds might have been made by instrument onek wound was about two and 8 jwj inches deep a post forteni exa milis tion was made after the death A dispute here ayoso be tweed the attorneys as to weather the notes taken at that examina tift could lie as testimony witness was alland lowed to read the notes to refresh his but not tm we as evidente evi denee he ban examined into the organs ALI tand them all in health Z uon except where the knife stomach thon the wounds the flit I 1 were ala 1 fata thought death resulted dl y from the wounds 11 divent cowie examined D deceased w resting 0 ver a chair when witness called and appeared to be i suffering greatly v quite certain he wag coras 4 oct in pointing out the position of the wounds on ho asor of air I 1 s I 1 iho on I 1 about lit the eighth ve I 1 orders that the deceased WAS i b a kept diolet and believed his borders had beell followed met quite a number I 1 of I 1 at this house there DO extein alI n i lee outside of ho I 1 wounds ei I 1 lie flad jagga glop 0 as ca aa r ars of W and baa 1 lived ig in N ober with the aa u and h b b been for chichy L knew a place f ld I 1 W I Limed on fiall about I 1 s quarter of a and was not with last winter about the land I 1 mr clarke asked witness to olit alloa 1 1 II the convers 11 mr kambau objected but ilia I 1 ob I 1 overruled act k taid narn es 0 I 1 I 1 several men w hose cattle Lail boen on allan I 1 and boyid stock to the estral pound defendant defend then asid U the w would not maka film right he aou id take the law in big own blind and use d very threat ening language to witness mr kinball inhye d W fiat D atis testimony stricken out a nd the bourt so mr ordered e a this talat aitu i copt to the place I 1 I 1 0 0 r C R 7 I 1 of the ho dells ingeni to kul trial witter anarchists inc I 1 icaco the whole pro of the durling the ear previous was taken into cofeld er atron they intended to show that defendant had attempted to kill a man for ilia a reason for which lie stabbed bybee mckimball Mr Kimball replied list the ti many w 4 a immaterial t that in the rage of tile as it con sti bat trew was the k adin this ease the mattir was in abe u tilt a hernoon ter noon the witness bad to buy the hay or to fence it in but defendant would not consent to it hiles said that to cattle being turned oct this range of one or two thou and acres simply would come and his hay to would not even of all the bay or allow witness to fence it lat his own expense the witness was cross examined by gir Kimball that halls bay had been fenced and that the cattle broken awn the fence 11 all had occupied the land for twenty civo or thirty years and raised grain and inverne In cerne di here wag any ordinary g government overn ment r an go land on the flat had been on friendly terms with defendant up 1 its con bad never exar essed the opinion that mr hall tto be huart co 1 then adjourned until two p in upon reassembling a number of sentences were imposed which are found further on the hall case was resumed david byrne was the first witness called w acquainted with mark hall wk familiar with the place known as it flat was not interested in any land near defendant had a con versal tion vi ith hall last fall about herding their cattle an his lant mr clarke asked him to objected to by mr kimball mr I 1 clarke said they expected to a how that lie made threats expressive of extreme malice to ards all persons herding cattle there ilia objection was overruled witness continued giving conversation betho n himself and hall lie met cfall on lain street was asked by him if lie had stock running on the iraln witness him no hut if there wera any be take them to the pound defendant then said that any man w he would keep stock running on another mans land was a sn s n of a b h defence asked that testimony be stricken out as irrelevant the court did not feel to strike it at that time defence excepted brigham fi towell was called he known mark hall for awen ty ars witness was a brother in to wm at bybee it e re the dec eased received the idour les from which he died it was monday april 1888 on that day he received word of U is trouble he bentio J M clarks residence resA dence shore he found deceased on the loung ebent over on his knees dr rowers was present deceased was IOU and the wounds X a in t of the adach about three or three and a half inches apart clarke did the recessed dec essed make any statement in your presence witnel yes air mr clarke what was it objected to by the defence as ln competent testimony the trial of the competency of was be fore the courtaud cour taDd not before the jury the jury was occluded and witness then gave of the all aged dying statement bybee stated we did not expect auch A thing as this when we were on saturday evening it Is ne ceArY 16 80 for a docter except die wounds I 1 realize that I 1 a bi hands of G odana it IR beyond the F ower of man to help to bring me to my health again tl im unable ever to recover I 1 regret very much that I 1 have neglected my church wb ich I 1 will not have I 1 privilege of attending to now I 1 al ill see that attends to them it I 1 do not 11 v a to we her h end for my family as won as they cat i be ilia afraid I 1 CAZ 11 ve till I 1 hey ga bere cault allow long altair the was it that his family arrived r about three hours centt boug liter 1 the affray did big ili 1 I 1 about 48 bout I 1 A hat oi to take m y interest in tAek beep hard and property and pay 1 debts if theta is any left lot my family have it rid do what vou can for my family talt they might obtain it liveli assist them in attending to the church works I 1 arke do jou mean by church works ir by arp that 44 done for the dead such as sealing husband and wife th sef were inar riad but had not t a ad witness relating the al lebed dying ment As follows 1 I w like to be administered to and prayed for the power alone can ramo rv mo from my pain no phy ja for me 1 I 1 wish you for me ua 4 I 1 ini fc ate condit in ace I 1 regret the on T arh hrh am leaving my auy it Is forme to leave to ineat when by the hand and kissed her saying he waa thankful aba bet to t O I 1 1 re 10 1 wed to live to leelier wi t was cross examined by kimball and some discussion aroe do the competency vt the testimony it th atallo it orl hepting ilia portion referring to being the murdered man instead of the mur deilor should bg read to the jury I 1 the the depo 8 read to tb a al after which tato examination of the opo witness ws co were fita F ita in the chrep ber I 1 the spot wit brothe affray took place had tean wanta on to witness did not know the boZin daries of dialls land lucinda by ee widow of thede the de called she man eby haij broe c living and one bead was living id hooper at the tim 5 bei husband 40 calved his injuries its soon its word wag brought she edel to tile bout of clark where fault d b er h b dd in a condition b wd musj 8 the time that he did thin I 1 eer would get well I 1 thought lie had a death blow lie wished witness to the church works bad not been sealed to her husban awas ln arfIsa bya put I 1 ceo f t be lilace I 1 no raes examination 5 foroni brown was ile that he had down it statement state mAnt conr tile wounds I 1 deceased had sustained i B bee ali feared to be in sound at i time TI a statement ement w As p r odla ce I 1 in court and bitne I 1 i a th ais of aho I 1 4 1 t J 4 I 1 riad been altered since atness it ness had last ceen it the alteration altera tien bad been mado by dye justice of the peace As the site ration was I 1 n favor of the for AIr Dyo to appear and explain the alteration cross ait ness had auk reste d the taking of a statement as babeo was vomiting blood anti might succumb t it was agreed to and bybee questions and took his answers in narrative form as to ilia court ImE Spaulding was calles here the prosecution offered to prove that the day after title statement on which t os bad been taken the Is to se de another statement to ira IL I L spaulding who took it down in som of nd and then offered to introduce it as d yin X declaration this wit r its L matter of fairness and v not be in isted upon if tico objected the defence did not object and bitnes ter tidied to having taken st anent made hy the deceased the day after the stabbing affray deceased said 1 I know that I 1 am going to die Is he took down the statement in notes and bad since transcribed 1 the transcription was introduce din court and identified by witness as a correct statement of the declaration of the deceased deco ased cross examined 4 took the notes about ilia transcript to day ato 1 ado I ace the notes this morning the examination of the inese Ine sj was until such time aa the noten would be produced the case haq continued until today to day peter came up for son fence yesterday afternoon convicted of unlawful cohabitation a d he was 03 years old and had very little property ile was sentenced to ahr months in the and to pay tho costs of the prosecution jeppa jeriod hid pleaded guil the clit irge of unlawful co habitation and adultery ila was so years old ile married his plural wife in 1863 on the charge of un lawful cohabitation he was sewen ced to three months and to pay the costs sentence Sin tence on the charge of adultery was I 1 until the ath of february peter anderson came up for mn fence on the charge of adultery lie was fafty four years of age and has already served a form in ilia penitential ia ry the sentence was two years im pr son ment G a arett wolverton married big plural wife five years alto his first wife became insane twenty one years and helas to tire some ar b y to take c aref f ter the county it refused film d and be had mar ried the woman who took care of his first wife sentence was abed ile n y charged with ful coha at ton was married to his plural wife about seventeen years ago 11 ad hot very little property the sen te nce in case was four months im and a fine of and costs james with unlawful cohabitation said lie was sixty two 3 ears of age ile bazi wives alive lie married his last wife nine years ago when shewak twenty three year sold childred the yourt eat of bibich was avier a ut avro tears oid lie was sent encee to six months imprisonment payment of casts 1 tence en the charge of unlawful cohabitation ile sas sixty ons years old his plural wife fifteen years ago ills youngest young edt child was two years old us was sentenced to als months in the penitentiary and to pay a fine of and costs john andrews and john kai I 1 co 1 evicted on two indictments 9 lary were sentenced to five years on each convictions the g of both sentences to begin to day the court explained that by this sentence they would get more benefit from the copper act than if sentenced two anique hall years for each of fence pet peter jorgenson convicted of fril was cal ledfor sen ile was forta baars boars old and his plural wife in ile had very property ile was sentenced to threta months imprisonment and to baythe osta of the pro monroe ovado cams up for sentence the charge f unlawful cohabitation of which he had been convicted for has not lived with his plural wife the only time lie bad her was to see his ekk child ile had no means whatever ho was asonta dc ad to booe ent and tay chii 1 J 4 costs bowman was od two chargin unlawful adultery I 1 lo pleaded not guilty to both on sentence was postponed til today thomas 11 turner a native of england pow e resident of weber county was admitted ad citizenship citizen sLip day at 19 M d fm P meetings of t h e belief elieS of the lifeber Yesterday I 1 the nula r quarterly conference con terence of the of the weber 8 0 0 I 1 zsofi was held i berday in t h tak 0 en 16 ae meetings ing atten and two mrs jane S president of ale societies of weber county ja otia to the general I 1 dency of the relief coclet C the church presided over these meeting A v y was ghe societies cocie ties in I 1 the stake among atie had visitors were 31 ro Z in a D president of the relief societies of the afta mrs emelene dwello UW ello erp nf delivered viere of A very and instructive na I 1 the speakers war identa V ZI V ou n C a n d Js n e i d i ard a editor E B wells counselor emily shurtliff sisters sarah chardo maltba A bingham ham sarah belnap eliza ATra cerand ann P te kington and bishop robert I 1 mo th 6 objects treated by the grobl cy were the advantages of 15 ng vibert feces ity t of ro to the rot afo ii af and other im the 0 a and of ae ent ri ara young ertain in ing to A rin and it was shown itt tin I 1 ehg 4 ceded this land c oni I 1 of fv from lamine this county eat i a generous contributor to the and deserves credit bieret or the aid extended to that institution but as it and canoot be s a charitable concely entirely supported rom r its ovill to sources and business income of thild contributions Is necessary arl wells gave the jib so some I 1 no t ru acton I 1 thi work and purposes of I 1 the V |