Show THE MUNICIPAL BILL f the argument sin the case of alays against registrar corey area now en dj the court has taken the as to register at large or as a citizen of the second bardt wardt ta ole in that ward has tweed to be of adv material 4 interest the broad of the legality of the ordinance and the I 1 I 1 11 authority of the to PASS it law providing for such ordinance Is now made the arsue sifting out the 1 I 1 I 1 f I 1 of counsel a dierso a tile law there is but one kernel I 1 and that to the point the of the enacting clause from the law it appears thal throng I 1 i some clerical error in the enrollment of the municipal bill bytho legista the g clause Vas omitted rn this state the bill I 1 presented to his excellency govi cruor went approved by him I 1 nd binder the of the of the territory diab found ats way anto the revised statutes whether that error is fatal to the act or not is the real question I 1 I 1 1 I 1 for it a aaa noti ably kentucky smith ansill tile erdl I 1 uc and tho liter at many other points but the argument upon theao other portals Is largely buncombe bun comie there Is no doubt that tile leg isla turo C had the organic right to pars a bill 1 I I 1 containing iden leal provisions sach a statute would not con filet in IM any sense yi ith the laws of cc 12 gross it does not nullify abrogate or I 1 t them it does not interfere with the voted and sacred rights oatho commission it does not usall any privilege of the political ty in utah there Is no doubt that I 1 this act the city cohea of ba den had it legal right to wake and b p ass the jordi nance in question as republished in this issue all the proceedings of ilia city council in regular only cerbin parts of the act applied to og den because this was a municipal corporative corpora tiva already existing only such applicable portions have been under but none of these have been ignored the ordin atice Is fair intes provisions and in its therefore we take the ground that the only point about which there is a question is the enact ing clause from the legislative on out should the cohrt decide that the absence of this c 1 ause daes not vitiate the alo proceedings I 1 taken under this het will be main talked but should judge Re conclude that the omission is fatal all the proceedings taken this law will be vold chiff int a ibry grave contingency salt lake and I 1 ogder acting under this statute liae toa faige amount viz which have all been placed I 1 with local banks whatever way be I 1 tho feeling of anxious officeholders I 1 who are in r politicians who R lantto get in we are of opinion thit the heads which will be ln st uneasy between now and the headson the bankers I 1 |