Show FIRST DISTRICT COURT one court opened yesterday doc ath a k 10 am a m in the case of the stites Vs garrott defendant with bew his aka of not guilty and an one of guilty sentence Sen teace was set for dec the grand buryi filed into conrad re two ind u rider th T 1 law and one under the un atu bbown witness who to sy anti the auy asked instructions fro m the court it wits mrs shunna bailey of I 1 cache county she 84 8 4 that she was the legal wife but to be sworn on her coir dire wh h was considered necessary to los 11 that she leally was the legal wile there more tillieo alves su sauna johanna and hannah the two first named were married on the same lay anti at the flame lour but susanna claimed to be tile legal wife th eso women had married jepy after some with nit the witness wit bess having reveled reee led an of flat haq wanted of her agreed to testify the case of the people etc vs wm pincer was dismissed 11 e case of ogden city s jagds 11 allt disturbing tile peace was roso curad and L R rogers and A it appeared for the defence tile cabie mccu pied all of the forenoon the jarf bringing a a verdict of not iam ty wong ding tho celestial I 1 reely need his pistol on another tallow few weeks ago was arraigned on a charge oi assault with intent to M and took statutory time to plead cn tenpo in the case of james berry convicted of tolling liquor on sunday ads until tuesday rec the case of Ogden city vs 1111 chael was next disposed of in this case it appears that mr ternes a ita I 1 ea tate dealer on fifth street bad I 1 oen using a small putty po P gur that some other party in handling it had shot at defendants ho wore tight trousers that in consequence of this defendant had taken the I 1 y at a interfered upon which defendant 6 track cernea in the chest much leviev wag andul ed in by the two attorneys jobars and rogers g the one forg ettiA for the me went the of the section under 11 aich the prosecution cution was seeking to convict while the other sought to quote scripture and found himself on un famili ar olad th ight in a verdict of not guilty I 1 in the case of the people etc vs azley hall the marshal was ordered to bring defendant from the pei itten biary george pidd to merly a native of england now a resident of weber conaty was admitted to citizenship at tile evening session the habeas corrus proceedings in the case of J B carrington vs david rees came tip for hearing it will be remembered that on a complaint charging threat ening and abusive language the tie fondant marshal of bri ham city had been arrested and an fn commie court placed under 1000 bonds to keep the peace and ordered to the costs me pg L R rogers a aan ar ey r rees stated there M in the territory making and threatening language an otence tm jer the designation of dastur biag I 1 he eacek though there was a law where t y persons could boo placed under bo ads to keep tue peace but that law h ad not been invoked therefore mr rees was illegally imprisoned and the commissioners court held no carls diction in the cate defendant was ready to file any bonds but not to pay the costs of a court that had aclei without jurisdiction mr hiles agreed to a the papers that it might be determined whether the case was the scope of tile court pr not the arguments in the re gi c aeo can be found elsewhere ele where in t his issue court adjourned until 10 A in tod ay 0 o |