| Show the borderland of bribery I 1 ne the custom of paying em 1 anent barristers bar large retainers to hold t heir tongue and not appear on the I 1 other side bas the features of own cehin to a bribe especially if any jurist so committed stifles his con jet ions and looks on quietly to see done I 1 was informed by the treasur er of a massachusetts railto ad fifty years ago that to get ahead of parties wehing to tap i t with a rival ronel he ran with al I 1 hate to daniel websters We baters office been already approached iti the ad verse interests and ho perhaps preferred the new comers cause answered in lutteral gut teral tones that made the ter abud der there are no bones broken there is no blood aspili and put the retainer f five hundred of easily warned dollars in his ve st pocket that minister of the law part of whose office is to check bribery is himself bribed who for pay under a case he thinks lie can carry bat lie knows or bellies bell ves to be but and who urges it on purely technical grounds the the cirit with arguments that have arl spight to big mind lie is a pettifogger erb Jile a bully too ell strong 11 on court and bit kas the theory of forensic fight in which as on the actual battle field whatever comes to i lawful that I 1 signally fit ailed in try in to co avine that excellent dan it d eminent eni nent judge whom I 1 well knew chef estice lemuel aba W that the practice of th e bar waa I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 ly 11 emr ik I k I 1 41 no still beld that contending counselors do their befit to re resent or misrepresent they having nothing 0 do with absolute equity or it ruth i t ayas for the cou rt jorj u ry to actor the fair or unfair broning of logical si rord |
