| Show DISTRICT k I 1 amors J a IO 10 I O rs who bild could lka tako MO anew will 0 ill nor 1 4 I 1 an mr S horrors Hor rocki ks ani and judge zane this morning court opened with judge aane on the bench afar tho if alio minutes ho tile petit jurors i were ere cillar sir announced that william il liani wil avil hain one orio of the jurors to s it n rein rei n lion boit ofil ier it if lie passes tile atlon ho lie should I 1 bo be eliud until next tuesday the cot 1 acquiesced tile prosecuting pro pros wuting euting attorney then proceeded to examine examine tile jurors juron for statutory cause mr gua gus lundburg of login logan via was first examined he ile all every question satisfactorily but could not take the new oath e of consi I 1 loia at this point lie the court elered that the new now oath bo be read to the lid t jurors that cadi cab might 1 it after lie the reading ft of tile oath mr 1 I lundburg was again asked if lio lie could take like it and replied inthe in negative and wa haq oTell cx used sed timthy ay could not take the tile oath at present t and was ee ebud ud d IV N agn gliskie and an 1 rd ed nelson of login lot 1 hid tail no taxable property und were bcd to igop down I 1 jolin john derham caino came to ogden from park city cit about tle the eth of la last lat t jul lie ile therefore had not riot rosi resided Jed in in 0 this 1 i Is t for SIK six months month prior to jan 1 1887 and was tva excused win icv cw ell ellei n as pissed passed but la Is a registration officer and ia till next tuesday I 1 1 V hen hell mr ini ani Hel tiel Ilor rocks name nias as reached and lio lie vas was asked q ked if lie tie woul d convict persona accused ace iset 10 of I 1 unlawful I 1 cohabitation as rea reilie lily as R 4 for an any kotlier offense offence of 1 fence ho lie replied ali that it be lie would feel to empathize edth persona persons guilty of unia unlawful ill cohabitation ienir lilies do you believe it to lie I 1 sir mr I 1 dont bel be keve e it under certain condit ions I 1 edit ed it Q 1 I lo 10 ou lieve A it might bo be in in rome some cases Q do believe ft right as an ab A lart I 1 lont bell it right accord ing to lie the liv laws of lie lind land Q do you ou believe it to ix be right A V it might lie V for some men inen Q j tint that i i 3 not the question do ro you ou believe it is is right rifi lit ano A no iso I T it is right according to tho the lavis of the lind land Q I 1 independently of the I 1 w I 1 A do you ou believe it is right A V 1 I believe it is right if it 0 o ia i s colaw no am Q if thero there wa ans i a law declaring it to bo be ni bould you lien then believe it to ile right A I 1 would it it I 1 felt as 1 I do today to day mr hiles to the court your honor I 1 challenge chil lenge linn him because the 1 law I 1 belleve believe require require hit that lio lie shall not riot believe belie 0 o it as an all ton von court well avell ho he might not be able to bit on oil ful cohabitation ion cases in other cisca cases lio lie might inight bo be a competent juror mr 1 idilea to mr do daou you know of tho tile liw law of 1887 1987 9 mr Ilor rocks yes sir air Q do ion you kno milic oath that act requires renu ires to be taken A yes sir 1 Q I from 5 your our understanding of t lint hat oath could a oil tale take it 7 A yes ier but thord are somo 1 11 is about aiding and abetting I 1 Z dou at t understand Suk suppose pose a man should ten dollars into the mon C alay mould that tat bo be aiding and alx abetting I 1 mr lilies I 1 dont katow tint that would lo bo 10 a inetter for you to settle for yourself court oart to mr Ifor rocks are you ou willing illing w to pay say that in alic future you ou still w ill not lot t ilc take a plural wife mr air yes air 1 I or that you will not enter into IY x gamy or unlawful cohabitation yes sir air I 1 Q you are willing to say a you will in in the future obey abc the the law not ft there might mij it bo be arec rove a lation rt quiring ou on to go into pol polygamy g amat A I 1 w m not do it if I 1 had to brea kythe laa a of tile lind land 1 Q I IA uell ell you thero there is is a alart law against it now A yes c I 1 w would I 1 not riot do it against lie tile lav law of the land 0 are Y willing willin to say you will not riot aid or a abet tzi toil on tit thi t inetter 1 I well ivell if pacing paying a little ittle iii into to the church to aid aid aliu 11 poor ie is aiding and li belling I 1 court tint that i is a que tion for you ou to determine mr I 1 w would not vi want ant to pay say no so A man nho is is a member of a an 0 wants to pay ome soine thing j to ait it and if paying pa ing 10 to tile monnon church would render ll 11 mo 0 guilty of perjury ie rury I 1 could not take it court that is 14 it question for your our eel sell to nettle settle mr I am A illing to bic obey tho the law of the land but 1 would alky ike to be able to pa p 1 money to the mormon churtz hurt h to help tile poor peor cout t well avell tint that would not bo be aid ing polygamy do you ou believe the revelation elation in regard to polygamy sir mr aion acks well lvell I 1 cannot bay asto as to that Som ethnos 1 am in doubt t Q are ou on willing to take in an oath tint that amt will not enter into polygamy A yes sir Q are yaju not willing to bay say on would V juul not teach polygamy poly gain oven even if counge ed to do BO so by tile head I 1 g ad pf the chulch A avell ell if by doing loin so I 1 would break arx ik tile lan aws a sf jw the lana land I 1 would not take any mins mans counsel Q you understand thero there are rc re ve lations boning pol polygamy gamy 7 I 1 I 1 leq t sir hir Q not W hiding tint that revelation a aro ro boll on N willing 11 ll to say that YOU ii will ill not i t t take 1 a plural plu r al wife nor teach iolyn uny ym A ei asir 1 poll gamy is is not intended for everybody y and aria I 1 dont w want aint more aives ft h cs u you ou pot got into such a a ca conditi 0 t that tat you would bo be counseled to tako another N wito ile Q I 1 dont expect to I 1 dont ant to tojiko take another wife under any cir ir cuell Q you 1 that llna this oath doc oed not relate only to pro sent nt circumstances but forbid forbids you ou from going into pol gamy amy in tho tile future even if till head of of tile church should counsel ya von to do 10 BO go vou you will not riot ilo 10 it A io NTO mr hoi rocks am I 1 excised excused your our honor lonor I 1 court no sir not if you tako take the oath laughter mr llor Ifor rocks eat sat dow down n w m without ob timing the information ho lie evidently wait seeking for a plain construction of those perplexing w worl orda 3 aid and abet j as they aro are used in tho oath tho the following follon ring jurors w were ere panned for statutory casel each stating that lie did not belies in tewo poleg gamy maa w as in lnor favor of enforcing tho liw aws of tho the uni attl states against polya polygamy iny and unlawful cohabitation ila had read tho the act of march 3 1887 and could subscribe to the oath therein provided for without mental and co naden 1 11 vank price win Nor bonnan niah J I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 stevens 1 hann matthew T iva W vet john jol iii e ariy riy r jr dm edtl moo I 1 I 1 I 1 OA ind AV 11 1 bon chadwick T J Pl blanger anger aut ti iu liv n Petel Itt tiHon soll 1 1 vc erson hyrum aluni Ul uni I 1 11 aikin fred t Sing niR lefon lefort 0 it thedis leigh C lirk AV tf 1 1 hand ind 11 bert garner 0 the of tile cac of the utah il and coin ini col I 1 leany ats jaines thump hon man the dial ilia I 1 of bih vw tilt set for to da 1 N tin 1 1 med wk ed and alio jurors v LIX L ze ed till t to o in orning at ill 10 court adjourned till 2 AFTERNOON atto oc loil in ili lie the cai cayo ofia of niort KW gage a demurrer to complaint w ftc argued by 1 11 J art arett 1 K I 1 naho n lio represent tha tl defendant 3 1 lomax 1 mf appeared fur for the plaintiff the 1 I leaa leao to file an amended aul ended complaint om plaint was v 14 granted in tile cidot of iverson 1 vi 8 james Ifor rocks J D I 1 lomax for pla intia 11 anda nd J I 1 N Kin iball for defendant a d was as argued and arid tak taken en under tinder A recess ni v as taken I 1 |
