Show MARSHAL DYER franl frank 11 II dyer united states 31 marshal arshal for utah is 11 supposed to bo be responsible for the doings of his deputies some friend or employee hould should therefore notify him today to day cf of the conduct of deputy or bailiff me lennan last saturday batur day night the latter person is ia not under leonds to dyer Is this because the marshal lias has more confidence in discretion and integrity than orli or rs atts Attla ifko if u that confidence seems to have ha been i violated lol atod because wo we doubt doub tifany if any ot other herman man on dyers force would have acted as mclennan acted toward sir mr budge and lug his attorneys or is it bebau because e Mar filial dyer cr needs a creature to perform cert certain ain c classes lasses of 0 woric work whose whoso conduct ho lie can lecog nizo when advisable and whoa who a doings lie could depudia t 0 if the fellow should ever act lilo like thompson tho the slayer of dalton it if so the marshals plan platt is is not devoid of cunning because sooner or later if me anan n continues in in iii ins s present co dyer trill will have to repudiate some sario denous s deed of that boisterous person deputy u exum owes aduey a duty to 0 o hie his principal and a part of that duty is is to inform marshal dyer minutely of I 1 the indefensible conduct of laia 1 let saturday night the marshals ina confidence should iv 1 protected fron from abero |