Show president BUDGE of hear rear lake like idaho arrested in ogden I 1 A WRIT OF AS CORPUS I 1 Is sued for and ti is denied me ahll baird of idaho will be b in ogden tomorrow to morrow at the depot last evening ilon win L lidge of paria bear lako co idaho idalio was arrested rosted by deputies exum and mclennan the officers were fit informed that the gentleman was at lie the I 1 depot I 1 by telephone and ilia his arrest was on suspicion A writ of habas corpus was applied for by Rim kimball ball whito and attorneys for sir budge but the the marshal lial not li liavine avin been wen n made lado the matter was continued till lo 10 tills this morning the matter art dragged aged along till tills afternoon a i hen licit a formidable array of attorneys appeared confronted confront ol ith a stupendous black of books to contest alio question idilea ed od by rogers and the gentlemen named above appeared for applicant mr hiles explained that lio lie should autove tho the court to issue a warrant comm com bitting sir mr audgo bud go aa pro videl videa in ili section 1011 1014 of the statu statutes tes of tile united states tilia this section ecta sets forth ill eliat a t ape a person may bo be cammi committed eted for trial in ili ono one district dis tri ct for on offense charged to havo licen been committed in another district distri rt t mr kimball said that under those circumstances they were ready for examination aini nation and ft entitled to bo be confronted vath witnesses the tactics were then changed and the application for habeas corpus was opposed hl by the return ol 01 which set forth that affiant was informed and believed that applicant bad lild been indicted in the third district court of idaho Idalio for unlawful cohabitation mr kimball kimbal I 1 demurred to the return on tho the ground that it get forth no of bense unlawful tul cohabitation maybe kiy bo a common term but it is not an offense known to law Fur furthers therm ore the information comes by telegraph and from a third person it is is indefinite and charges no offense tile statutes atutes Bt of utah terria territory also pf provide boride that no person shill shall bo held for an alleged misdemeanor ft without a warrant ft not on information and belief numerous cases were cited to show tint that petitioner could not bo be held beld the court paid said ho be had not had sufficient c time to look the matter up its ho should nish wish to it is apparent from the return tint that exum belie ca petitioner vw wag charged v with etli an all offense in in idalio idaho ilia of information is a tho the samo same as that used by everybody body the court did not think tile petitioner should bo be discharged charged die tile courts of tile united states have ano abolished tho tile distinction bet between oen a misdemeanor oranda and a felony alio court geould aid in the furtherance of thi vr as K well ae as to bee that the li libert bertuM ioa of tile citi zen aro arcs preserved d tile return is is the it best 4 the ma inar r arvel khal it could 0 uld make and tile court did not think petitioner should bo be discharged d i qc a rg ca tho proceedings r oc ceding were considerably mixed m I 1 d counsel cains sel for or petitioner being ar a loss once or twice aft ico to know w I 1 if f tile attorneys for respondent acro arguing forthe for alie return cam oving for tile war M ant tit to tot commit petitioner till ho the marshal from idaho could arrive mr hiles explained that if they could not catch them going they the would catch atch c them coming laughter tho the rit being denied counsel for petitioner a asked it bail would bo be granted tho tile court sud said lio he did not think lie hid had power to gio give bail and further hearing v as postponed poMpon cd till 7 p in tomorrow w ell tl lio 10 marshal from idaho expects to bo be in tov town n |