Show THE lit I 1 I 1 v ad J d T g KJ a 1 4 Is aicard from in Un lill tali i able emphasis CON 1 11 N IS Q 1 message 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 on Ace oust of ita ato tiff t tariff iff katlic woal wool be e bitin glyen protection W e lo 10 he the washington dec 7 kt t toda to tode da Ys w ision of tile bonfe rl e of I 1 m wool 1 I groa ers anil and wool deal tw it feta teB tile lie following ws wait unanimously adopted al i bcd file voi WOI 1 doasure and nd lva lv A grow 4 maj thyi dt I 1 edenfi t ft ia spital 1 i W of tf fi abil 1 a 1 0 t it a bilhou iou wool grun ran end sigr wool li I 1 il in in 70 L ference ruiel rv fl te tim farl nn dual of I 1 hb l Prell idom to t it cong knyrim ony rs rim 1 tl iri thai that lahe faliti in 1 of the ine inesm gittoe area aro i direct at ark tai 1 upon their icil otto of all the 1 I in most ailt of the inn 11 I 1 slid in in I etive tite of alic national SAH m it ik 11 iu ru platforms plit forms of and inter by llie thes piety and re a ethid by byllie lite rank and ain file of the part that the tile argument neade b by the an Pi eident for the removal of 0 I 1 our i protea protection tion against tot fur fsr n roll is one L 1 h bi by the of our reee and ett iu nearly 1 e cry linol district offar of our land and pv so dim disproved proved h hv the logie ff faeta and the tn tv akin of experience and history hist orv as t need 1 rr answer frem from ue us ate we had hula it right to ad a expect met lung tin from the chi I 1 executive autive of uke daum ilie noet most halapy prosperous and antl con coll leitel wei we I 01 cofini af t mad so by t the he of protection and anti tile de elopement elo piment which ho hn now weke seeks to det dez stroy artro ve we hud a right rt t to expect our mould favor the lb lopow r of the I 1 united states and 1111 couf ej our ht P di 1 la afe I 1 w t men instead he favors the interests nt crent of if our foreign competitors wo 0 o ernale au 1 frew lr lie to tp taft i asik and three luti rull I 1 to its ot atoot our fellow sm engaged ili in 11 to engaged eng aged in tit manufacturing to the army ot of wac wage ea carneri ear mers neri to 0 o a and ni n I mem 1 that thit the tile judgment and decision will tie tsi buted upon justi im B and und i n 1 I therefore in IM vir the b c I 1 antei In tei b t t tie e american 1 01 v 0 i cwi t ta n aich I 1 alie lie w 6 I 1 u ht fa ity t unexampled n arki it I 1 the tile whole A 1101 e amount silv 0 resendo rese nuo derived from tha the wool nv idas it faoul product tile th ua only about or was aa than titan 10 winta per e ta ot I 1 tle tile population bich is w by y for deigns rm tule hile flip the old war tax taxa q h b retain a yield ild of over ill 1 aral ie to a direct tax tit jr j lr l r capita ot of two doll ire its each wh tte the annual danual revenue derive rivet I 1 frow the import imports of wool under the tile tariff of 1947 VH was than 1700 under 1110 taril Tol ISM the revenue I 1 lat latret t yet A vw nera tyvr the U nia r of abir ebli bi il tile auntry III ri ima haq ill 17 a daer do ereSt elvit ft of ill million millions anti HI a of tho annual ool of overall OW 0 to F wallicia thue thus illo t that all alie radii alin ot tAri aby by the acl act of 13 1863 hm has h M in in created the revenue from I 1 imported n rte I 1 wol wool and diminished the tile allu rarer j abst if p i in 1 i jho united flakis about 6 pep nt n t the V I 1 bui o 0 h ig about the d detraction det arn ruction nr of t fits industry and nd the makaa 3 fiola VIM of the would end in di nater tj lit il ol 01 4 tho co milry |