Show A nice nico point the case of foulger vs y heller decided in commissioner rogers court on monday contained a very nice point in connection with ft ith the 6 statute rint of fl limitation the defendant iu in 1877 contracted a debt of 2960 and for t this hill amount and interest up to dat date e wabel aae being ling sued by the plain plaintiff th the e defendant d nt claimed to have paid the plaintiff wheat over and above tho the amount of hid Indebted nem and adso plead the statute of limitation etwas it was proven that the defendant was in the territory for oporto years after the 6 z I 1 I 1 1 I 1 d d ol 01 debt was contracted but on waa taken on the martof I 1 t the b pill plaintiff however ever it nv was clamed rd that the defendant bad a achon 1 l lodged i the ile debt since ou on two occasions in that in an answer a to the bills of the plaintiff IT he lie had said lie had balanced the accod account int with the w m heat paid the court gave the matter a great deal of research and decided that the letters of the defendant in reference to the wheat were not an acknowledgement of the debt the cac was therefore ther eforo dismissed A it I 1 ley wood Es esq waa was attorney for the tile plaintiff an and kimball white conducted tho case for ho the defendant fen fin dant |