Show v f y THE treasurers OFFICE judge henderson jias jim order ordered edthe the issuance of lie the writ rit gf re quiring probate judge SIM liff to approve and file the bond of illiam william farroll farrell claimant for the office of treasurer of 0 weber county A stay was secured by tho the defence for tho the purpose of taking an appeal if it desired but whether an appeal ie is taken or not or whither whether if taken tho the decision of 0 the district court is ie sustained or not tho tile real question at issue Ss is by b no means settled if it judge shurtliff had approved and filed the bond on Us its first presentation to him mr farrell a would hao have been obliged to demonstrate tile legality of his claim to the office by other proceedings edinga ho ile will still have that little matter to attend to in addition to securing tho the brit writ of mandate in fact the application for a writ of mandate unless it was proposed to try tile title to tho the office which cannot legally bo be done in such a way WH trems to bohne have been an unnecessary ind and useless move on the claimant ith the writ he must still proceed to prove ins ills clain claim in m tile prescribed way without the writ ho he could just ut aswell well establish his right by proceedings in quo warranto carranto war the tito granting of lie the writ does not prejudice sir rin Pin grees grecs case cat c the refusal of the tile writ rit NN would not prejudice mr farrells 11 caso a |