Show A BL r RA ie 9 bitne one fe ju it ath tai the 04 tb and charges that some one not connected with the pa paper per baa has come to the assistance of the tribune staff stat and d la is furni furnishing 18 ibling this di deport put meat 1 with ammu ammunition ato to make ake a ion long 9 etory story short we will my that neither captain smith nor anyone else ever wrote a article which the OGDIN refer referred te VU ak JH WV iu K heri thing jv balam d neiter smith na nor kny oos oi elmow ew wrote wi ote a line d of the 1 article ah ak kh I 1 the article git iaci lato la to print we pre alibel me of louree so uree captain adver x ar yone th TUM just ae biear that it wae was never written at all at as it does tw south never wrote it j aud aad why do iii this 4 A captain Cap taia come colip vp abd au tat hails the we so abil k 14 fin ie 10 who the Capt flin of arllin wr llin 16 sey says nit r lw ne ever wreta D a 9 ine that ach ph a ae arks ble piece of inept ration would natt frilly 1 b 4 at tri tributes to lim al WO jt seva oa atol we li aeve ve ac never ver a alan crded ded i 6 tle tain at all in this connection was it for this reman that the captains Cap tainK wanted himself se tight igat could coula tee fa w ve ia been i any bolher reason aw or sr the stat stater erbien dent t that nei neier lier captain smith por nor anyone else wrote the article in question tho tribune goes onto on to explain further it says and more ther ewas haea a man wa or child thit anew the article mentioned bad had been written or would appear inthe in the they in print indeed since the article in question tion according to the tribune was never written by anyone aby owhy except the writer in this declaration of denial if 11 the writer 0 who ia is neither captain smith nor nobody I 1 elsifor alf 1 ife eki say had told tola us at first afla that t hia i foolish defence of the jini jim crows wae was a apiece of inspiration whom no one but the X tribune 11 devil kv teas as responsible then their have been pr prepared for the assertion that neither captain smith nor anyon any 2 A afee 1 gritl aw A 11 ling 4 of it and that it not ot a man woman or child except zee pt ta tn writer knew it had been written and the writer of 1 1 it l writt cu at alaj all because Ii neither elther captain smith nor anybody else ehe A lindof it r f now 3 f t ia bet the imbecility crookedness and contemptible ignorance of tha th oga den department of the tribune nothing lot hl I 1 ngian can such imbecility I 1 is s a disgrace such crookedness ia is a natural brand of the father of lies and ald ouch uch igno ignorance rAnco MOA is insult to b even vr en M gentilo inte in 1110 1 I 1 qed gd en P and alid yet the poor JW anti t C ff of ch peris s ale 1 and st claves aes that ali r ailed to patronize such |