Show ONE YEAR i j i A bmw ami WM vimo FI HO UPON A GREENWELL SS SR the court instructs mr green betl live bithia the 1 law 0 other th air B business U i I 1 n e so there wasa was a goodly number gators present in tho first district court room tine ibs ma morning aning A gree greenwell awell and barnard white were present tho the court having se get tho the passing of sentence upon these thes e gent gentleman lemaA for today to day mr white was asked to stand zip p when mr kimball announced ce I 1 a motion fora forn now bow trial and the court stated that it would hear the argument at mr greenwell was asked to stand up and the court addressed him as follows you were indicted bv the gr grand and jury of efthia this district charged by one indictment with unlawful colial citation daring during the year 1884 you were also indicted by the grand jury and charged with unlawful lion tion for the year 1885 upon being arraigned you plead not guilty guilt boboth to both indictments you afterward after afterwards wary voluntarily withdrew w your pica plea of not guilty guilt and entered a plea of guilty to bac each charge you therefore stand convicted by your onn own plea of guilty have you any thins to tx say why sentence should not now be passed upon you mr greenwell nd No air the court can you inform the court mr greenwell as to whether I 1 in a the future you propose to obey the law of the land mr greenwell well just a few words the past history of my life is before the people what the future will be I 1 cannot say the past has been a good life but I 1 am not pre pared to say whit the future will be the court from your plea of guilty the court is informed that in your our past life you havo have violated the laws lawa of the land but you say you cannot inform the court mr green well wellIn in faith did I 1 take my wives wires years ago now I 1 stand before you to receive whatever you wish in protecting this law that ie Is all I 1 wish to tay i the court if you were to re receive what the judge wishes personally it would be upon receiving from you assurance that you would obey the law to suspend sentence cases the court is aware that in most things you have been a most excellent man the court is aware that in una this community you have a largo circle of friends at the same time that has given you a continual influence among your neighbors and the people would say if good a man as greenwell can violate the law why cannot others you have continued this violation of the law after you were aware that the law was being enforced sn forced by the government you have in other words determined by your conduct notwithstanding what nhat he the law says I 1 notwithstanding what y your 0 ur countr country 71 ina to and do 0 as you please that you ajro bourt L ourt hie this morning whether you will live within the tho law jaw or not I 1 wish you might I 1 w ish you would eay say to the court henceforth I 1 will hiye with my leeal legal wife I 1 will not hold out nay unlawful wi wife fe to the world as a wife 1 see by a statement from those now in the penitentiary that they eay pay they are not aware what Is necessary iu in order to live within the law that the courts havo have failed to instruct them now that you may bo be fully aware of whai what is required and that you may not go there feeling that you cannot tell what the law requires you to do I 1 would say to 4 you ou what I 1 have said to two or three others the law is 13 simple and plain the principle upon which tills this government is founded is the christian idea of home one wife wire one mother and otio home all that Is necess necessary is that a man shall live with necessary hie his arT legal ga I 1 wife if he lie cannot live with her then lie should live w with ith no woman at all he lie should clealo unto his lawful wife and lie should say to the world this ia Is my wife I 1 have no other lie ile should not hold out to the world the exam pe of a plural household he lie should not hold out to the world other ladies as wives that is i not permitted bylaw by law it does not say he hould should not aid in their support it does not say sav he shall not contribute to their sup support port nor see their children are not ed educated U all thia this he cannot legally be forced to do yet it t is a moral moril duty be he is bound to attend to of c course ourse if you are permitted to live w with ath one of your plural wives vives and choose which doneit would lead to confusion you may con consider ader this matter hard but a man sometimes has todo many things which seem hard it Is a duty it Is a duty you owe to your country had I 1 hope you yott will reelect upon it so that after you have undergone the sentence of the court you will be a true and law abiding 11 citizen your example is greater than some others there arc are others who have followed your teaching teachings and have entered into plural marri marriage agge there could not be any more painful duty imposed upon thia court than to toi pass isa sentence upon a man whom the judge personally lias has learned to look upon as a a friend during his residence here but a court can know no fi lend lendi and therefore in theriane ther the name iame of the law for the law and la in behalf of the law the sentence of this court is under indictment no 82 48 in which you aro ara charge charged d with unlawful cohabitation during the year 1884 that you bo be confined ili n the penitentiary for a period of six months month and tat that you pay a fine of and on hi u 27 hi lit Wk akichiyo which Ichiyo you tt 9 are pre charged with during tho the year 1885 the sentence of the court Is I 1 that you be confined in the penitentiary for the period six month ethe latter sentence to begin and to tak take tako o effect on the expiration of your sentence in no 21 and yen you will be confined until the flue fine imposed ed la A fully paid mr greenwell was rem remanded in into to custody the arguments ments before the jury in lit the case of orth vs brown were com plated and the jury after receiving a cot comprehensive and elaborate charge retired the cabe of the U S vs A J ker shaw was postponed till tomorrow to morrow morang at 10 the jury in the case of orth vs mccown co imo i court aad a amnet in favor of plaintiff the case cue oi of laetus va vs chamberlain was Wits taken up and tome some points in e connection c t on with W I 1 t the matter discussed recess till 2 p m ArrER sEs stox at 1302 mr NIr kimball attorney for mr B white argued hie his motion for anew a new trial on the ground that the court erred in admitting the testimony of the witness jano jane fife white and that tho the evidence waa was insufficient to justify a verdict A assistant esi stant attorney lilies briefly replied and at the close his honor announced that be would filo an opinion tomorrow to morrow mornine morning at ten the case of lashus vs chamberlin camo to trial and a jury was panne led this suit ia is brought to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by a breach of contract on the part of chamberlin the contract referred to ie is alleged to have been made between the parties to the effect that mr chamberlin should not engage in the hotel business in in ogden city subsequent to the time when plaintiff purchased the chaco borlin berlin house at one time conducted by the defendant who is now proprietor brict or of the central hotel |