Show DISTRICT COURT A cadwick ch 4 dwick convicted on oil a two count indictment MARRIOTT PLEADS PLEAD GUILTY NC N 0 proven an guilty john jarvers Oar Car vers case die din missed dewey aleo also escapes D at 10 this morning the tile courtroom WM packed ed with witnesses and spectators it beine the day daliet set for trial of a number of cohabitation cases at the opening of court the jary jury in the case of W 0 child vs LY JL wells were charged and they retired tire d the case of the united state states vs A Chi chadwick three count counts was called for trial IV H dickson conducted the prosecution and C C richards and ben sheiks appeared for the defense def tnie the following jury john alien allen J S thomae thomas C A eklund A I 1 f stone siane johnson pullam PU ilam andrew larsen mark fa etcher joh john germ germer er william beeston I 1 E spaulding ding george corey a and n d J john 0 1112 keck the clerk read the indictment and mary alary anu ann chadwick was sworn witness testified that she he iras was married to defendant in 1860 mr chadwick had another wife living at t the same time the witness wae was ex excused aused and is ifs mary ry chadwick was sworn witness came to the territory in 1852 wae was married to defendant in 1850 mr chadwick then took the tile tand stand and awl stifled testified ai as follows prosecution when was you fir first t married in 1840 when did you marry again in the spring of 1850 what wh at was the ladys name mary Fo foxhall iball did you marry again yes yei to whom mary ann newby have you married any more yes one when about 16 years ago where i is she she is divorced have you married any more no I 1 never married any more laughter vary mary ann chadwick was recalled re called and asked if she was married to defendant in ING she ie replied plied yes sir air where have you lived in the ont skirts of north ogden au an objection was here bert raised to the accept accepting inK of further testimony from this witness wit nese by the defense on the ground round that she the was defendant defendants s legar wife the court said that it bad not been shown that the lady on the stand was a legal wife the examination continued H has as your husband lived with you d during ua I 1 the year 1881 1884 5 6 dessir yes sir mary wheeler took the stand you were married to the in 53 were you yes sir air where do you live in north 0 ogden d an how far from the other house about two miles docs does he come to visit you yes once in a while about how often about week does he ever take meals with will I 1 you iou sometimes lie ile stay stays with you all night when he fie comes I 1 suppose yes how often does he stay with you about twice a week isabel chadwick was called and testified that ehe she waa was a daughter dauch ter of mary ann chadwick she did not remember of ever hearing her father speak of her mother as a wife her liar father futher sometimes came to see her mother had heard her bar mother speak of or her liar marriage to her father the probe prosecution cution then rested and alij i case was submitted A recess of ten minutes was taken after which the court charged the jury that if they bell believed eyed beyond a rea atonable 11 doubt that defendant within the time mentioned in the indictment had lived with ac held out three these women as his wires wives be he waa was guilty of the charge named in the indictment 1 ent A form of verdict was made out covering all three of the we indictments and so arranged that the verdict on any one of them could be separately noted an officer was sworn and the jury went out after the lapse of thirty minutes the jury returned with a verdict of guilty on the three counts the case cue of the US vs N NC C M or was next called mr dickson represented the go vern ment and C C richards nic hards and ben shocks sheeks appt appeared ared for the defense aie the following named jurors were called C K R hauk hank J II 11 Tri aible 0 geo U B douglass and 11 II krigbaum before completing the panel however aa an adjournment was taken till two pm on courts resuming session W 11 dickson asked that an order be made the indictment against john carver the court acquiesced charles christensen was arraigned on a charge of grand larceny the indictment charged him with teal steal ing a calf at seme acme time durar the month of july 1886 A P plea ea of not guilty was entered the jury in the case was then completed following Follo winz are the names andrew lareen larsen johnson pollan Pul lanMark mark fletcher J S thom A L I 1 stone and win beeston Bee eton flora flora B took the thi stand I 1 was married to mr air hortensea Morten sea pen in witness lives I 1 in n weber county and has three children the youngest youn will be three years old OR in february witness husband goesta goes to see her once in a while witness knows defendants other wife her liar name Is mary ann she lives a couple of blocks away from witness place prosecuting attorney darin daring ig all thie this year up to the first of this month defendant has his been in the habit of coming to your house yes sir air he ile takes meals with you 1 has his be he never taken any meala meals with you since yon were eye married f no sir air he stays stay YOU with ayou you over night when 1 becomes a comes to see you docs does be he yes sir the hixt witness wit feea was a ten year old eon son of N C and mary ann martensen he lie was asked where his father r resides and replied that be he lives with bis his mother in huntsville Hunt aville osden ogden valley the case cue w was then submitted without ou t argument the court delivered the usual I 1 charge in much euch cis ca A and rid the jury retired john job marriott then stepped forward and through he his attorney clr richards charde Ki announced that he be wished to withdraw this former plea and enter a plea ot of guilty to both counts in the indictment against him he ile plead guilty and the time for passing sentence was ft set for saturday january ath 87 the he sentence een tence in the chadwick case will be P passed sed on the fame date after deliberation of over half an hour the jury returned with a verdict of guilty on both counts sentence will ill be passed ov andary ath at the request of the prosecution cution the indictment against james dewey was aleo also dismissed at sante hour this afternoon the charge against mr dewey wa was unlawful cohabitation |