Show first district court at the opening of court this morning in the case of rosenheim levia A co vs J J brewer ct al mr heywood asked that the case be dismissed at the costs of plaintiff for the acason that security for costs had not been given within the time required by tho statute the case was dismissed in the case of lorin farr vs P R chupo in which a motion fur a new trial has been duade mr Kin iball made an expadie motion that no costs be taxed against the plaintiff on the ground that the pa acra were not served on the same day they were filed the motion to strike the papers from the file was 1 1 denied mr Kin iball then moved that alie clerk be forbidden to make an order for judgment for costs for the reason that the statute in tine matter has not been complied the motion was granted and the court stated that the supreme court will be in session tomorrow to morrow consequently mr Marsh who represented the defendants wished could apply for an order to show cause why this court should not beet this judgment aside the motion for a new trial in the case of L farr vs P R was then argued at length by mr kimball au various grounds in the matter of burlock vs shupe mr marsh was allowed time to file an answer to the cross complaint A recess was taken till 2 pm this afternoon mr kimball continued his argument to which mr marsh replied aal the matter was taken under advisement tho court then adjourned till thursday june |