Show THE rj CASE i if i A synopsis of hie di of the in tho supreme court ou satur day justice 0 W livered the opinion of the court m the case ot B Y humpton the alieni points are given he low A peculiar state nf facca is shown by lie record in this case if would seem hat lewd women um to open of ill fame in lake it ia clai ulc that men who had not bun or morality to H piet kiich allurements allure ments were beguiled therein and that ho unholy watched broin through peep bolea by members of lie force ii is insisted that this was donkin ahe interest ot vir tjerand morality the defendant is a prominent mem berof th e mormon and this fact becomes material in the object iori to the panel of auroia hereafter re berred to ru of abs tbs challenge to 1 the panel of the court ro 1 altea the circumstance of the selection of abe jury refers to the testimony of carshul ireland on the trial and says thai they think the clial lenec was very properly prop eily overruled i the opinion quotes from vir ginia va rinea U 8 also payo 3 tia cose in the latter quotation the following occurs from the return oj the district judge it would efem that in ment hc presence of the color on the jury is essential to accuro hem tho lion of the but how biou is reached is not apparent ex cepl upon the everol en erol theory that such can only be tu cartiea where of the claas i to which they tho correct ij of this theory is by every dayn experience women j are nt ollow etl to sit on are alln y thereby denied the equal pro lecile of the lawn in this country arc nut per i bitted to act as yet no one will pretend chiu ahey di not enjoy the pr lection tf the law the opinion gets on to that thai the did not summon cormons mormons they were not im they ay the court the jury tant n house or ui faide la kept for the nce aud shelter of persons unlawful bextine inter is it I 1 argued that hlll instruction s aronious cro pal misleading wt the opinion after referring to the of the it the court I 1 ing tha cli argo of tho court to the jury 1 the defendant only intended iq dt c criff b und ay under lucli u of facts they consider the charge mi improper or I 1 the court then d to thu charged to iho trial jury id said they fairly envied te case and hey cu nl hid iha the lower court had charged the jury wrongfully nor wrongfully omitted to charge them Ite ferring to the testimony odthe woman field in regard to notes to different gentiles and of one ot these notes in the evidences the curt says it was quite proper the opinion asserts that there was testimony to show that there was a conspiracy formed for the purpose of prominent men not into the house for the purpose of blackening their character by way of reprisal for the punishment of those who haye been convicted of violation sf the edmunds law the opinion which is concurred in by judges zane and boremon nn concludes as follower it is insisted that alio 18 it is claimed thac the fans stated dri not constitute the offense to bo charged or any of fence against alie deft jdant the indictment that the defendant entered into a conspiracy ano fields ti keep a enuse of ill fame and that between the day of june and the ast 1st day of Or tober 1885 llie eaid Field rt in pursuance of said conspiracy did kap buch house the indictment sentis to us to meet the of our statute laws 1878 p 58 the indictment changes a corrupt agreement to do criminal act and that in pursuance of said agreement tho criminal act was done there is no error in the record and the judgement jud gement of alie court belew must be at Firmed |