Show GUILTY abo result of apostalo snows f lii i A HEW POINT A firstag Fir stan dJ Legait wife in the first district caso z snow charged with unlawful cohabitation with his wives con of yesterday afternoons proceedings edings mrs eleanor snow took the lrenzo snow was her hua 1884 she was never di him during 1884 they liard the same ftc they did prior to that lime mr snow moved away rum the old homestead about four at ara ao witness recognized recognised mr esnow as according to lier religion during 1884 she has nl lived with him for a number of yc ars air snow never dined with her during 1884 cros examined did not liyo with sir isikow as his wife during mr snow did not eat or at her house during that year han no rf collection yf his calling ho did call it was for the purpose of inquiry after the welfare of the children rn mr Minni eSnow was sworn she was married to lorenzo snow in 1879 she lived with mr snow in 1884 used to live at tho home it ail previous to removing to the brick house state if mr snow during 1884 he was away a good deal never saw dim aming neighbors or friends during 1884 ho did not have cit air snow stayed at house exclusively while helas in cily lrenzo snowa ahr was called husband is a igon of isnow sen she is a ui er of mrs minnie snow saw mr goow in 1884 in house and he was alone ber mr at tho homestead during 84 saw him at her sisters house never saw him in company with any of the other ladies named in 1884 they were understood bj witness to he his wives during that year frank H snow was sworn saw hia fattier on the street in the store at meeting and at a reunion re union in 1884 the on the anniversary of hia birthday not remember teeing his father at his d hous house e during 84 docs nut recollect seeing mr snow with the with the ex centino of minnie during 84 cross examined his home baj harriet never saw IUA alere at any time during 84 is satisfied mr snow did not eat or sleep there lucida A snow took the stand during 81 witness resided on his farm about tw north of ity his father in carious places in 1884 never saw him at the old homestead there is a wall around it and he would not have seen him if he had been there SAW mr knowin company with witness mother place in 84 these ladies were all lecog ti iad cs mr snowa wives by wit and dump 1884 C his father and mother in company with his aunt crime to his place sometime during afternoon at the time mentioned tha wallin wall in front of the old h 0 teal a about four feet high ich a kind of picket ecce ou top Is cerium ahe visit ans in 18 L it could not have been in there ii nu wall in front of alie brick house is a stone wall on the wet we t house redirect the brick house 13 about 20 joda distant froni the old houses are partly alio enclosure there is a at tho afe lucida bow asked the privilege of H statement to alie jury the granted and he vehemently to the jury that his mother is as much his fathers wife o alay as she e ver wad it be to prove that he mt ather hamge luring 84 but 1 calill she is hia whilo no one can pay he ever fit bcd there over i night lie bishel the jury to fully this matter that his hi wife today to day IL much FO ais alio every was enry snow was called was to mr snow id has and according to the rulings of iho coneta could not cl one witness in her awn riu 6 iri 1884 aad had irvid BM prior to hat time at sho lived in the old mr snow provided fur i support aurius 1884 cross examined defendant did not rat or sleep at witness home luring 1884 he called ad antt iran tit roan friend if he did call dr J SAW d fl ring 1884 ut beveral places saw him at tho olio evenings even ingi aune services to mr family during 1884 aud mr snow paid witness for huoh the ladies anre ac sunwu wives cam mr t alic to ee lii blaugh ier who hotd fractured her skull he did nit stay long probably five or ten minutes the testimony teo f abia witness was gicca in a very abrupt manner yesterday in marked distinction from bia course the other day then his answers camo slowly and with much hesitation but yesterday be wua apparently boiling over with evidence and could hardly wait for the questions to be propounded he almost seemed to know what auca akina would be asked and ahot answers were required mr oscar deputy marshal vandercook took the stand and reiter abed the story of the arrest he searched the house from cellar to and from garret to cellar lie bound a trap door under an Anon pnra goatskin and discovered arsnow in a email apart beut eplow he did not gate tho hiding ml nut know whether there was a subterranean passage from the brick house to the homestead and in answer to the inquiry of the defense he could not tell whether there was an underground route from there to ogdan laughter tho prosecution then introduced a diagram of the premises and an adjournment till ten am on day was taken at the opening of court this morning a late subject ot queen victoria renounced his allegiance to that sovereign and became a full fledged citizen of this united he was admitted ho was subjected to a rigid examination by hia honor as to his future conduct whether he would do all in his power to discountenance the practice of polygamy ahe case of the U avs loranzo snow was then proceeded with the prosecution called another witness C C corey and asked him whether ho heard the statement made by defendants counsel at the opening of the former trial and if so what it was to that question the defense ob ejected ou tho ground that tho ad mission referred to was made for the purpose of the former trial nd andar no circumstances be aed as testimony again them in this case the objection was sustained mrs snow was called for the dc lense she remembered the circumstance of going out to her sona residence witness sat in the back seat with eliza R snow aed they drove out to lucius place air snow drove on to his farm and when they re turned to brigham city they mccu pied the places in the buggy on arriving mr snow and his alighted at the brick house and witness went on to her residence P P madden was called he is elder aoun ty lie has been connected with the recorders office the deeds of the different houses were handed to and identified by the witness and their location explained witness lives a block and a half from the courthouse in going to bis place of business be passes the brick houie defendants Defend auts home waa at the brick residence during the whole of 1884 witness always found mr snow at that place never saw him at any of the other houses in that year the general reputation in brigham city was that the brick residence was apostle snows home in 1884 and had heen for some time previous the premises owned by several of these ladies is surrounded by a stone wall which was constructed twenty years ago making improvements some parts of the wall have been pulled down while others down in front of the old homestead the wall is partly partly picket and any one passing can readily bee inside the enclosure the there are several othar places where it is partly down and persons can ece into alie yard and premises there is nothing to obstruct the view cross examined there lias not been a seven foot high board fence put up entirely around the premises during the past few years several rod rodi i of the fence have been built witness is construction ol 01 both houses the prosecution asked witness to df tho location of the trap door and the question was objected to the court ruled that witness might be asked whether he knew if there was si ch a door witness replied that he did not know oc its existence in 1881 1 the ladies who have testified were known as mr snows wives witness transactions with mr snow were of a and business na turc ho never baw defendant during 1884 in campay with any ushia wives with the exception of minnie dues not remember seeing any of mr snows wives at tho theater the prosecution asked whether if the witness did see them i there ho would bay so and the wlad aa replied that he would moat assuredly mr know moved away from the old homestead in 1880 ur 1881 the witness than gave the date of recording the various deeds witness is in several enterprises terp rises with mr snow among th m the store mill company they are on n terms tho desired to find out who arc the persons who were responsible for the general repute that defendant defend aut was only liv aug with only one badgering waa in little satisfaction to the prosecution but causing ciuch to the spectators the his composure throughout in reply 0 the rather t or question of the utter uey tho wittier sl ailed he would answer all the questions propounded cd and that lie considered tho oath he had taken as binding tho prosecution finally gave up in despair and tho v i in esa calmly stepped down and took a scat by the stove II 11 E bowring was called he is ft resident of Brig liani city ilia place of busu iCES is on the same block as that on which mr snow resides ho mr snows residence every day when he is at home never saw defendant at any other house than tho brick bouse during 1884 the general repute waa that he was living with but one wife during that year cris an mired airs snows faist bif VB adeline he did not live with her dij riny 1881 the other ladies named iro reputed to be aliu wives of mr snow witness never haw him visit any of these latties laities in 84 llo auw him pass their hodis on witness wife afas of the persona who by general reputation knew mr snow wa living with but ono wife mr booth aU entile was tuia made a this connection this present year the laiter pan oath 8 testimony oay was stricken aut this closed the evidence ou both sides and alie prosecutor roade hia opening address to the jury the prosecution according to the assis taut prosecuting attorney labors under great disadvantage in this case in having to get from the enemy scamp ilie art reluctant and all that they state has to bo drawn out of them by a examination if tho was made against the attorney how ly could he 0 o on the lilues wi lues t ta nd and repel jhc thc lie how elfr had nil opportunity of darlng llie case and he would hear what the to gay going further uia remarks were very brief and were directed principally lj toward defendant was guilty because ha biad not of hi own accord chosen to deny ahe charge and furnish evidence which the prosecution biad not been able to obtain mr Kirkpatric lc followed will i an able and touching address for the defence he carf lully reviewed the evidence aej referred to the fact thatty 1884 no legal construction had been iven 10 the word cohr bit and consequently the dependant de was to construe the word according to his b eat knowledge and bad done his ut root to fulfill fulfil hie requirement require mend of the law under llie telling and arguments of mr kirk patrick the statements of the tion viii hed in ahin air his address was given with his usual ce bance and bayle and during its derf i i very except rick was ih by the court n regail to a certain guint breathless prevailed in the court room and alie eyes of many present were filled with teara au adjournment i 2 p m was then taken AFTERNOON SESSION at two p u this afternoon tho court room was titled with an interested audience and after iho jury had been called hon F S richards Kic hards adre sed them stating that the idea has buo ouo burih that for the defense in these cased appear before generally withal idea that their cases have beep and ahat they merely the jury fur ahe purpose of indulging in rhetoric and of oratory but euch 13 not the case the jury determine what is alie with which the defendant is charged the defendant inthy have been a during the whole of the year 1881 he may havu declared it publicly but under tho of the court diat u not sufficient to prove him guilty of unlawful co ufa roust haive livid willi these women during the period mentioned in the as a husband lives with his wile there has been no evidence of a habit and repute af the bet u 0 they have testified that during tile biar 1884 the defendant did nut live with them as except with minnie the testimony by the prose cution does not proyce that fondant bield out or cintr these aa hia wives and it certainly jiin ami that he did not live with kiy of the w man named with the exception of the defendant i a not ou brinl fur funnon cism aud no how widely the members may dirr dir r bruni him on ii ints such matters cannot hii venny weight with them in thu tri alof ahia cate cat e they stand as a bill work the acl mid the clamor of a haiim tah court should be not only a tempi of but a temple of beuge mr snow hus bern convicted once he ia old and gray nd imprisonment midy mean nut mercy is not supplicated sup for justice ia all that ia for amt 13 expected edw trusted tant alic jury will have th moral to show u man charf d will un lawful cohabitation in a utah court cn if he is mr richard closed hia tid and pro andren the were acry to thop made u so u the former rial and nearly the arroe line of argument was hallowed tall owed ahe charger fhe jury in much the language as the charge in tho former case adding the jury found beyond u reasonable doubt that defendant had during the year 1884 a legal wife living at brigham city box elder county utah territory broty whom he was not divorced recognized her as his wife held her out as such contributed toward hera an d eliat dur ing the year he lived in tho same house with the woman minnie and recognized her as hi wife assoria itce with her as such holding her out aa his wife then the of and you will find the defendant guilty t the jury then retired find after nn absence i two roi re turne dinto courland cour tand through their foreman presented a verdict 0 f guilty as charged in be indictment |