Show FIRST COURT demurrers filart arguments tomorrow the district court room was filled with a miscellaneous amli enco this morning the subdued burn of many voices was terminated by the bailiffs hear ye 1 and the journal of yesterdays court proceedings was read approved and sicard judge R K williams who appeared for apostle snow asked for burx aber time in which to alcad for the purpose of retting tho decision of the court of alie united states in the A M cannon case his honor stated in a rather abrupt manner that lie could not grant further time counsel knows that the judgment of the lower court is affirmed and that should be sufficient amr williams stated that they also wished to file an objection to one of the grand jurors his honor still persisted that the case must go on according to previous arrangement he really could not grant further time j t in the case of the people of the territory vs C W hemenway on the charge of libel mr hemenway filed the following demurrer to the indictment in the district court of tie first judicial district of utah territory weber county the people of tho territory of utah libel H charles W hemenway 1 defendant in proper person demurs to alie indictment an this cause upon the following grounds 1 because the facts set out in said indictment upon the face thereof are not sufficient to constitute the public dor crime of libel as charged 2 because said indictment neither charges no ravers any acts which constitute the publication of any libel 3 because said indictment does not aver or show that defendant did by printing by signs or pictures or the like publish any thing of and concerning the said charles S zane or to impeach hiis or virtue reputation or to expose him to public hatred or contempt or ridicule 4 because the facts alleged in tho indictment upon the face thereof are ambiguous uncertain and unintelligible telli gible and therefore cannot cons the crime of libel as alleged 5 because statements by the indictment alleged to be libelous and a libel and to have been publish edby tho defendant upon the face thereof have no reference to and cannot consequently be a libel upon the said charles S zane as charged CHARLES W OGDEN december 1885 the prosecuting attorney remarked that he should have received a copy of tho demur but be stated that in coni t of tho fact that mr not a member of tho bar the attorney for the people could use alie original copy mr hemenway stated that it id true he is not a member of the bar but ho expects io be very shortly the court stated that he would appoint a time to hear mr Hemen ways argument on the demurrer II 11 T B gray entered a plea of not guilty to the of procuring an abortion at the request of the prosecuting attorney the case wag set for trial on saturday dec tho defendant having no counsel the court requested judge williams to act as his attorney this gentleman declined however because of the extraordinary tra pressure of business and his honor then appointed G J ma arsh to defend gray the petit jurors were excused from attendance on the court till ten am on thursday mr arthur brown then continued his argument jn alie mining suit the following criminal cases were set for trial for the november term 1885 the people etc vs charles W thursday dec the people etc vs john smith thursday dec the people etc va john smith thursday dec lath the people etc vs hank wheeler friday dee tho people etc ya J C morton and C W carson friday dec the people etc vs thomaa henderson friday dec the people etc vs henry T B grey saturday dec the people etc vs charles W hemenway monday dec the people etc vs hang borg tuesday dec buo cuo alie people bic vs james brown tuesday dec 2 nd the people etc vs J H bright wednesday dec 0 ia the people etc vs william jonnston Job wednesday dec gog the people etc vs P harlan thursday dec the people etc vs moroni brown thursday dec the united states vs sarah nelson thursday dec the people etc vs jack monday dec the united states vs james H nelson sr dec the united states vs jamea taylor tuesday dec the united states vs charles F middleton wednesday mr D M stuart was arraigned on the charge of unlawful cohabitation wilh ills wives there are two indictments and mr stuart took the diroe in which to plead to each at half past one honor announced that tho argument on the case ot the U S vs lorenzo snow arill be heard at ten tomorrow to morrow and the argument on the caso of the people vs chas W hemenway will be heard at twelve to morrow the grand jury camasto court and presented one indictment under territorial laws in tho matter of the people vs C W hemenway on the chorce of it beling federal mr hemenway tho leeo of withdrawing his plea of not guilty entered during the lant term of court for tlc alc purpose of filanc a demurrer to tho complaint lis honor pave permission and ho demurrer will be filed tomorrow to morrow morning and will bo argued at tho same time aa the one filed this morning W K white and FW white arraigned on the charge of grand larceny judge the defendants and thoy will plead td tho indictment on thursday morning at 10 their bonds were fixed at 1000 the mining case was then resumed |