Show dihe denouement Yesterday the ran dJury fury cylio t I 1 iril 1 ii court and presented euc indictment under united states laws before mckay acting as assistant l prosecuting attorney teat certain of ane grand aurore refried loi do hia aci ac i capt the highhanded high handed dicta of ane court mg to thefil report odthe down by akrep bt ikc eastlake baale ri t mckay A t least 1 togao say win ther he should fand an or aitho same hy the evidence alti claiming that it bould be ansur pation on the parta of the grand jury an indictment certain circum i alie evidence warranted it mr alien afati ohp objection wa in to lanil i ing more aliah lawful n in period tho juror referred ti said he would do no such tiling in spite of beilig eliat his required it of jhc thc counti mr mckay under alic circumstances circum alie said uror competent aa the court asking forbie hamp of the man alio liati dared tp leayo an opinion contrary to that fyd catlon cut lon ir N W clayton was named aa the person abat bot deny ali at lie was one whose conscience would not permit follow the dictates of had as be 1 thought colw right ite biad hot however refused ito indict where abu evidence then alleged that theurer haa refused 16 certain taia cases which are stood to be t booja 1 a and A M alisser who aro now serving out one CL penitentiary for that offense upon inquiry mr jacob moritz and ul found to enter i 1 ta inthe li as mr clay i i vy to a ton whereupon judge zane an di essing the three men said i 1 I am surprise tha r fusato alrin an to warrant judsen of ati law it is for the courts te decide a i to alie constitutionality of alie laws you are acting on your own oaths andin not ariti with your own coh your duty to bringing if the evidence i sufficient io convict yoi fi the law more alian the court can ii clayton Clay aad mr davis you jare excused from panel ef to serc your country as graild jurors and you come before the cour comp prepared to biffl youra in ra anner your may retire li will tha abe chief justice here assumes that tae t three grand jurors who had not alfi J ir answered the or aro i mck uy woud fotr nd ainu ji nu phen the evidence was iy I 1 i and apon thia ay false assumption be assumes the rigby to ai t i unsatisfactory aurra without looking authority for BUCK achari if tha acl alb ne cloea no Celam acter cf a judicial tyrant upon chief justice zane weare greatly mistaken were he inta craven afan asiatic ties pot he could hot have performed a un american judicial feat and by the way we lifo tb now why U mckay appointed v t eluting attorney we that akay pretended quail and when arc so many good and able attorneys attorn eya to be bad in salt labe city it is very strange abat bmckay be chosen 0 a properly qualified person la ft possible that mi M i kay claims upon laro they running the prosecution business in company and throwing fec into each others hande properly entitled t them are pertinent ested by ahe duct incorrupt If corrupt agreements do not exist between atheni we cannot un their co conduct |