Show Sup supreme renic court decisions the following is a synopsis synopsis of recent decisions of the united states supreme court 1 r PRACTICE where final prod root is made on a day lay other than thai at advertised it should be submitted to com gomar with special report abst co min r to Ine inspector hobbs march 1885 christion names of members of an ila unincorporated company or association a making nia an entry shou id be stated in such entry er pat 1 I 1 1 mcneil aud alien allen assac co cornar Corn mr i r march 9 1885 MINERAL no law restricting a person to one location on the same lode panoche grande rancho grant having been pronounced fraudulent by tho the US U S supreme court it will not be recognized bp the band land D department a part ment and if the claim should be finally rejected by garrahan could not enter the tract in question under the act of ju july IV 1866 as a purchaser in good faith on account of the mineral character odthe land A protestant an t has hits no right of appeal mcgarrahan Oar rahan ve vs new idria al MR ag co feb 26 1885 homesteads arranging in the f form orin of a square logs found on the land is not a su sufficient dicent cent act of settlement or im proy ement the hearing having been ordered by the comm 9 r the cost should be apportioned e equally q bally between the parties writ writer er vs RowSe cry march alth 1885 PRIVATE CASH 8 ENTRIES on lands not subject to such entries may be invalid ind and voidable but they are not absolutely void and other entries could not be al lowed for such lands while so ap greated gria pria ted weimer et al vs ross berv march 3rd ard 1885 REPAYMENT OP OF PURCHASE MONEY ROXEY allowed where party made his entry through ignorance of law and was not guilty of fraud el Er parle arte bang lang acting seers jan an lolli 1885 A 4 INDE INDEMNITY finity SWAMP certificates locatable Loca locatable Loca table on bands lands subject to private cash entry at it per acre state of indiana com comar M r feb 1885 SANTEE SIOUX reservation lands therein which have not been selected by indians will be subject to entry after may alai 1885 assistant comar march 1883 A selection by a few individuals nob not actual settlers is not a valid townsite selection nor can a legal selection bo be made wade of land while in an indian reservation A preemptor whose settlement antedates the townsite selection has tho the superior right to the land keith vs townsite of grand junction review feb 1885 INDEMNITY SCHOOL selections lands reserved for ludban purposes may form a basis borsuch for such selections state of california acting jan 22 1885 |