| Show I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 CONFLICT M i A L correspondent gc so socio me san ble 0 n 1 I 1 1 1 lal OF I 1 question i t 1 i I 1 questions Ques tlona of the hour which aie arc it attracting ng much attention coming numerous nuna erous but hane more important octant to tho readers bifi ayour adu r paper alia athani w uso which threaten the peace and future of atall I 1 that her most eacret and vital a interests should be antagonized by v any uy political party in the guise of je enactments or ot judicial of ex post facto operation of if law laii ia S much to be regret regretted wd at present her ber political existence 1 i threatened her social institutions ire are invaded hei her I are tire being wantonly disrupted the I 1 sanctuary of homer is no longer regarded I 1 aird ed a a security til to its intimate atea Q fie tho licaus peaceful ful MH I 1 1 I p citizen cit zell must furco forego the lei its of home flome atit echil lil f fildi I 1 dreu di aud and friends or his rights to liberty aud and property are denied him i we ve say because the ord ordinance i C jufa auf juf plural u ly B af ofaf polygamy la is argued as the areat bone of contention rrth aih this n aagon tagon ism h i based 1 J i j 5 11 g p L 1 1 n it R th lh rAthia t I 1 I 1 W 1 prevailed in utah long f tire auy itay I 1 legal gl enactments exi exist aced ed consequently its intro ai did d not offe onried ud against any I 1 P law it was adopted by Y the popple when by so 80 doing the they arrayed t themselves heru selves against no baw faw le alt afier her it lyumn or divine they I 1 acre agog monistic ta tf n no o or egv rev aw a pili cabIc to the of humanity gr the enrolment enjoyment aj of 4 danl fyman idt pad I 1 I 1 W hl p proved r v ed ia aud a b ua etca 1111 d did I 1 X not ji disapprove proy ii livi alien lAvro vh ereis idoeta the luense ense ome io in I 1 nowhere I 1 I 1 Q 1 lawa n I 1 11 zed ity ithe r bvm kukit to war V ar with 0 I 1 t ali I 1 i wece all I 1 citizens of utah who ft lio agresor are eaf belled elied and 6 i fit 6 opposition 19 the J laws awe w VS V pie mid in ini direct I 1 that sentiment and nud moral condic i tio tion n of right rifi lit as i nell us against I 1 nh rights he the 1 chiv hiv aw bifi vt purposely iely directed I 1 1 thelah Th the elaw was made when gamy aa an institution could not I 1 interfered fid I 1 I 1 11 v a wi ill vea fa jac i 4 1 doul could dhave have been jay mhd luct and redious redi ouy i convictions COnViCtiOn 3 of the people ann an I 1 1 d dah f arif th tha 6 fir lap I 1 toey foryan bf the ivAdy anig put antof nt I 1 of t td 0 baliel p ra el I 1 f I 1 I 1 r i k it t the 4 hii have aa lay 0 o 1 am 1 t iga in C aej nf 4 K rah th sti I 1 rai ti ma 70 la as the edmunda edmunds bill passed ed moro I 1 i than thirty jhb pl pr ratite I 1 had bad be been en kllc pc people C lia hh jAd 1 er 0 fc E 0 91 OB il in appointed equally arlin st chaa ind ian ii t 14 I 1 1 iks 1 a boia I 1 wi k t 1 i t 1 it aoi k wille seq 4 q I 1 1 I I 1 I can catt be inflicted with even ft a mv 0 V W cc lAt crl I 1 IA IA E f ty ht y alel to V 9 19 lilii P aa A if I 1 1 1 gent ent mind either Z as ai oc aurist jurist it etisa is a ihm tit blee aaili I 1 kioh of or it P I 1 attl P yohma f f A V vicc ic presiding ar 11 ill 1 kt CPU V lie lid and acting I 1 atnes e I 1 ate under oath to su support the con ait ution was approached by jhb writer w i iter efthia of thin arle upon all tho poes 1 r bill bilty ty af pf 1 the in titling bylaw by law iu ill thos aeme rheid thiro 1131 ha 1 been no violation but ahe offlie tic cpru at diun tiun was sn Q appah io aim that abath we A dec declined linea to express opinion in much uch leris legi dared darell to botay toy that a legal remedy could be coula bo be enforced ill iti such cate s fl ihlae opre it ia in fact ud honorable legal itata that can call justify any arly such application ic 3 a law taul 1 ts have so 86 the tile fact wib would as 01 ol bild iha guart lins of the moral of 6 people pie should irani learn that morald are ceol not created ya tilh I 1 r ve laeno aro ure i oto 1 atly r wa ir hunfau uk a will 1 11 I 1 alt at it J 44 all 1 ob bj I 1 I 1 gantong brei by aDiv inQ bajil iiii WV giver and are binding spoil the con 1114 acl 11 liea t children il I 1 I 1 t to 0 t t c of it 6 thal pe agh t IN am 11 I 1 e i A fl J its 4 valay dovw vw aalt lay X na bmw VOX in the 1140 a i ra I 1 14 bowled now I 1 ed led g 0 al i 1 g A am to hitri himself telf the ienco teach elji ni ait and 3 rong rom om 10 I 1 his hii y teaches him hiu aba I 1 ll 11 fo ve e is 6 hafty i that the froug froug brings mh cry I 1 the pu pursuit auit of hap is ill an I 1 1 inalienable right and permanent I 1 happiness cans tuly be foundry found foun dby byi living in strict conforme conf ormi ty to the tile f tile sold 1 ilahi ila 4 bich hh I 1 I 1 5 i it PI no c t quience where here such uch convictions exist ay iy it dierson of integrity 1 he vares Vai enill mt air asiel mu al till I 1 evs mav v V como from d oi tv fie I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 imprisonment and even death have bave no terror i human law is only just when it vindicates divine lawand and lends its au T to encourage anil arid develop iho the inor alSand spi spiritual ritual of humanity but we are I 1 d there must be no aw recognized in this republic EH ell eriar to the law of the land lit mans 1 an Is wora mural I 1 an aud a spin spiritual it t ial nature must 1 be copitc tho the imperfections of humanity can pro toi iida pc must have hate no higher astira aspiration 0 lop than inao mati and matter fati can supply no spiritual tuil or prie etly mens afra affairs irs I 1 an otter tilter disregard di regard of all ills dis and organization claiming divine ata authority bority nn niri d sanction is the il final r result eule and effect of the christianity hristian ity of the age under which republicanism can flourish a its adnia administration ni of unconstitutional unjust and oppressive laws against the harals of the mor for tuon is as liaw no represented by those called liberals 1 all abia ia is cout contrary to the fact that an all acknowledgment of the tile moral i 11 oal law is I 1 ls ri it natural requirement in all provisions fo for iho the public wen weal 1 it ia is the moral law which governs and free beings and which determines tho the character of vice and virtue moral duties m loav ballass ba classified ifield as Ps being duties to god to our fellow man mail and to ourselves but these duties arc are hot to be separated duties to god comprise comprise I 1 essentially all our obligations t ign anil and ivan a roan wall answers fully a good conscience conscience towards god he cannot have left undone avy very important duty towards man 1 i I I 1 god the refo re I 1 it u s t be re recognized cog n ize d as ns tho the great Su ruler It tiler and n 10 0 rule of aumau be allowed to alita antagonize the rig rights lita and find liberties t 8 I 1 IQ 9 1 has orl V vouchsafed 6 cl abed to man it noru any wl so prevent man from doing his whole duty to god to hini eleand hia his fellowman fel now being made to dl destroy epry i tl 4 amity relations and bactal ties of or a quiet peaceful and otherwise prosperous people is it commentary apol the chiv ah christianity of which vii ieli we BOM boast A ail a array rray of host hostile ile powers again 1 ar 1 arties of a ili lag baji god r iq aiple p 1 a pope people who havo have chosen whom they will keryc IS W R |
