Show FIRST DISTRICT COURT great trouble in dettlaff Jett Gett laff a grand jury to suit the divorce case of dehner TS TO ach iter Is compromised tur nov 19 pm judge williams resumed his argument contending that the co COTI con n pluitt did feet forth good and suf grounds for action mr air P J B barratt aratt rr att in connection with captain smith and acl haw M dean on behalf of the other parties sued by the same company sub submitted mitto their demurrers on the same ground as that taken by capt smith his honor held that each assessment ses was a separate cause of action and should be separately stated so that in case any of them were ere not sustained the rest may hold good the demurrer was taken under advisement in the case of the corinne mill stock company vs wm win johnson John sou edward P chase and kimball Kiin ball roywood for plaintiffs plain ow J marsh for defendants the demurrer to the compliant com plant was overruled leave was asked to ameni the answer said the calendar would wold not be called in its order until monday next when the traverse jury would be im paneled on the application of captain smith the case of aneal neal vs v oden ogden city was removed from the law and motion and placed on the trial oWen calendar dar the motion to dismiss the action having been overruled and defendants exception noted in the appeal case of heber wright TS daniel walker in claim and delivery for one red and white cow valued at 35 and for damages 30 and nud costs 9 tried originally before a justice of the peace who substituted cathrine Cat brine fuller na as defendant in place of daniel walker iome bome amusement nt was had the justice having given judgment by default against plain tiff who did not appear to meet cathrine his honor advised mr marsh and hit his client walker to go back before the justice to find out where they were ii was evidently a walkover walk over case elwood H orth vs john david kimball heywood for plAin plaintiff tift mr air 11 W 0 margary for de fenn dant claim for non of contract defendant defendants demurrer sustained on pleading statute of limitations more than 41 four our years having hilving elapsed since cause of action arose arom court adjourned adjourn cd till 10 a IB in thursday Thurs daT nov 10 a m the court inquired how many grand jurors were expected from a distance ho he was informed that chri time e were expected from the South and four from the north probably not sufficient to make a u panel of of fifteen after passing the inquisition ordeal captain smith for the prosecuting attorney informed the court that the prosecuting attorney would not challenge any of the jurors until the fifteen were in the box all the names in the box were drawn and a venire was issued made returnable returA able immediately for those residing at a distance and on monday next for those residing in the city the jurymen juryman who had been first drawn and were in attendance on the court were ordered to be paid their per dion dt ein aud mileage and were dismissed as a jury to be summoned over again for monday next for a new grand jury J judge d ge williams informed the court that in tho the divorce case of dehner definer vs dehner definer the parties had com compromised promised the husband agreeing to pa pay the coats costs this he had neglected to do counsel now applied for an order of the court to enforce orce payment granted the case of chipp hill vs W G child we are are informed will be carried to the supreme court the motion for a new trial having been denied the court madean made an order that all persons held under recognizance to appear before the present grand jury are further held under the same to appear before the next grand jury which is i to be im paneled on monday next court adjourned there being oo 00 more busi business tess aa that could bo be transacted tobay to lay |