Show FIRST DISTRICT COURT P I 1 11 II Er emerson ierson opens his ills au ut tribunal for HIP tile Bib cr term terri tio the polygamy Pr problem rut to part pc goni am placed in ili as geralld J jurors it ro rs 4 sf monday nov 17 1881 1884 at I 1 11 I 1 a iii n the usual hear yc ye was proclaimed and the court was forni formally ally opened the names of ortho the grand juryman were called hut but deific being less than twelve respondents q spon indents on dents ho the drawing drawing draw inc from the box was reported to and a venire was issued the jurors present were sworn to giro iva true answers as to their qualifications after which the usual que questions quintis were put by mr varian geo ue nelson chas A hall mr St hepler aud find mr giles were excused on account ot of their belief that it was ivas right for a trip to have more than one bif wife fe leviti living 11 and at ilia same time 1 the following lolloping lol loping were passed as to q qualifications john I 1 W V kerr wm goodwill goodwin E R C peter S al mount W 11 II res rex P F A shield Shi elle and S S schramm making seven jurors thus far ob ell taina tain tai ind A E H F 1 munn wai excused on account it at ut his reside residence 11 cc del being ig al i short dver over the liny jim in davis coun conn mr attorney was sworn and admitted to practice at the bar I 1 the accounts of commissioner felshaw were presented I 1 the court w was as adjourned until 2 pm to give time to obtain more grand juror jurors 2 p ro his honor ival wakened ened up tip the dep uty marshals with a 1 I sharp stick to lit hurry irry up the lion appearing jurors whose choso whoso had bad been drawn from prom the box capt smith on oil behalf of waters vs ogden city explained the status of the case win WID waa examined as to liis qualification as a grand juror when if lie heli believed eved it rig right lit for a man mail to I 1 0 have two living g ed d wives at the til 0 same tigue tit tie lie lle paused pa ausy e 11 while and said 1 I dont ion t know how low to to answer that flint question you bruit answer ye nr or 1116 no or say you decline de clitie to in iwer what is your belief P 1 I believe ia i the bible cut BA do yau iii believe that flint a amy in i is right according Acco c 01 iding ani bible it is i t we dont doht want mant your reasons reasons for believing but wo ask in you belove it yes I 1 in alieve lieve the bible tells the truth and therefore fre I 1 chave bif it is right the juror was ivas excused in the case of curl wilon vs ho tile wilson irrigating company for damages in with withholding holdim from him hirn his hi duo illie portion of water vater for irrigating liis 1113 crop crops 0 of f 1881 1 mr kimball K i mba 11 dc d c demurred to he lie counter claim of the defendants defendant viz that tho plaintiff tit had unlawfully and forcibly broken tho co companas comp lupau anys ys canal and arld taken the water to which ho le was not entitled to the tile damage and ina illa ury of I 1 he lie company to the amount of f i 25 which amount tho company put in wi n a counter claim mr kimball claimed that the two bratis transactions actions were Eci separate arate and could not be connected j judge lV illiams plead pleaded aed aa D the tile contrary other attorneys attorn eyE barratt smith and felshaw Felba iv having baving ft a langei in the tho pie in ill three other such casee an a arrangement arall was ejude to try the tile whole to I 1 getheral ge theras the ruling in lit onu one case would cover all till the others othe rs at the gram grand aurora were excused until 10 a ro tomorrow to morrow worrow |