Show I 1 I 1 if Joji ii r 0 case cas C r five years ye ars ago ngo the first grand graid ju jury rk which i was packed with non lien or mon for the purpose of in in dichting g persons accused of polygamy gamy found a bill against john fower of 0 ogden the case came up thursday before judge banc froin front the tile oblivion where it had been slumbering under the van zile rc regime jand nd the full day was as occupied in iu arguments is on the met motion T on to quash the indictment P F S richard R 11 williams aud and judge harkness represented the defendant fand air dickson the prosecution A among mong the long list of reasons advanced by the tile defense the following arc are the principal grounds ground eliat tb at a number of the J jurors brors drawn and summoned were ex excluded on account of their belief that the law of god was more wore binding r than that of congress although the jurors so excluded also said taid that they would find an indictment for poly polygamy gainy if the evidence justified it that one juror thompson bitter ritter bitto ritto who whose to ahmo n amo was not on the jury list and was not drawn from the jury box was put upon the thelmet list ini placer of thompkins name was on the list that alexander alexandr majors another of the juror jurors was not a resident of of or a taxpayer in the tile territory that alexander inia majors ja rs and 0 it Gilber on nn had served on a jury within two years prior to tile time of finding this indictment and that they were I 1 disqualified under llie tile statute stu tute judge zane zade is expected to render his decision this morning in view odthe of the above str strong Dg ground grounds and the others advanced it is not thought ho lie can do 10 anything but grant the defendants motion S L herald 11 erald |