Show HOLD YOUR HORSES alma keyes koj e geta gets away with U S marshal ireland this forenoon before justice dec dee the case of henry keyes vs E A ireland U B S marshal came up the matter in contest was the ownership of a certain team of horses flagon wagon and liar harness neEs alleged to have been wrongfully and unlawfully taken from the pomet of the plaintiff tho alleged owner by the defendant the whole depre benting a value of P J barratt appeared for the plaintiff 12 ti T while kimball A hayduke represented tho other side the plaintiff swore that in in sept 1883 he lie being at that time married and living apart from his father asked asked for the loan of the property in in question and his father there and an d then gave it to him as a gift gif to enable him to make his living telling him it waa was his entirely eni irely and to 0 go g and make a good living for li mn elf and family at the time of f said gift alma keyed keyes was thoroughly iol vent some timo time after however the gentleman named entered into partnership with another party al and id becoming evolved was unable to meet his liabilities ies on the cb co of omaha commenced euit suit against alma keyes and hia his partner and arved a summons upon him at his residence rca on or the an all affidavit had lieen ileen filed in the district court asking for attachment to ii aint the property of eaid alma kayes ir eyes on the of the same month the deputy marshal perkins levied upon the aforesaid pro property erty then in possession of hen ilen ry rt kelca eyes as the property of his father t I 1 r alenco the suit which was eel set tied today to day by justice dee giving giving decision ec ision in favor of the plaintiff upon the following evi evidence d en ce E L rice 0 was present in n september when alma gave the iro perty to the plaintiff and recited he conversation that took place when henry took possession of the team and w was as tickled the defense admitted that other witnesses then named would testify to thonol the fol owing lowing facts IV Keyes prior to the transfer had entire chares charge of the th e team cam and others knew it was his property iro perty bat but after the transfer the pl litiff hild complete control of the learn team there the plaintiff rested tested the tile defense then introduced deputy marshal Perkin sto identify certain papera papers issued under the district court in tho the case of maul co against keyes ef al plaintiff objected to tho the introduction int of the affidavit for writ of attachment on the grounds that the return of tho the summons showed that alma keyes was a it resident of ogden city weber county on the of february and that that was his usual place of abode as shown by the return of oi the marshal but on oil the tho the affidavit swore he be had departed out of the tile territory the objection action was overruled by the judge and the writ of attachment and execution were admitted ag as evidence perkins swore he took the property from the plaintiff plain tilT but supposed but would not positively positive I 1 y I 1 say it was in the stable of alma but that henry was present and claimed to be owner thereof the defense then rested j after long and learned arguments in which the legal gentlemen spread themselves all over blackstone kent and other counties tho the judge pronounced judgment to the effect that the marshal return the property to the plaintiff or the tile value hereof and the um sum of 85 S i damages for fur actual detention henry keyes havill having g been part of the tile time custodian of the property |