Show I 1 1 1 1 f I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 GRY ARGUMENTS A field day in tao tha star route prosecution r YV U to tile I 1 I 1 Wins aup aug SO 30 mr wilson said tho the defense impeached testimony by the utter improbability y of his story and bv by showing show ing what w hat ill his motives were john ananias walsh ll 11 ad a suit pending against brady and i if f ho could nal break win down downing in a criminal suit that was all ill that at was necessary brady denied lie ito owed walsh a single dollar mr ker where is is tho evidence of oft lal that right ii t here replied sir mr wilson handing ill g ker ti alie IC papers 1 I pers in the suit 0 of f walsh ker glanced over tile bullers pullers and eaid kaid xo such evidence there wilbon replied that under the rules of court courts it if tho declaration of the i plain had not been denied under 0 oath 11 judgment judgment would have been rendered d r long ig ago attorney general it is 13 not in ev id idenie enve wilson mr attorney general do you ou to lake take any advantage in this criminal easer case attorney general 1 I want to try th tomasso is ao in accordance acor dance with the 0 or r di kiniry nary forms of law and the evidence eviden c e 1 given and the attorney general of the thet united states replied wilson tur turning n angrily and acin facing that gentleman is hero to take advantage of a matter he tic knows if ho lie does not know it here shak shaking I 1 9 1 a I bundle Of aVaDer at the at attorney orney general is is evidence of it do you on buffer suffer that exclaimed tho attorney general angrily jumping to ins his feet I 1 I 1 do not propose to buffer suffer it 11 replied the court coart 1 I am surprised ei that counsel generally so proper in in I 1 ins ils conduct should have forgotten himself a lie seems to done in tins ingUi instance lm 11 W ilson 1 I always aitt a s thought if our honor please the of government wits liever to do injustice or take advantage adv ofa citizen coin com t there is no chance of in being dono done by tho the evidence but there is a chance of injustice being done by bringing matters into tile discussion disia ofa case casis before a jury jur As which aich aio fire not in evidence wilson jal have it is 13 because I 1 have been following merrick court there to a roans mails it in making nn an address to a ju jury ry unless a man nian attempts in ins his fights rights to bring ann in in facts not in in evidence proceed in order mr wilson wilson then proceeded to arue argue that there was no testimony to show that at adv odthe of the contractors included in tho the i indictment n ali had ever divided a dollar ditl brady brad the jury was askco to go goober over tho wido field of p 6 alid anda cu lation and brind brand brady with I 1 11 hav living ing done his otric ial acts not with v etli dionest motives but bot for corrupt pur cobes uk k said wilson near the close of ins his ai argument gunie nt told told the jury jur that brady though receiving a small salary vanic to bo be the owner of I 1 palaces in the city and he lie was revel ing in wealth and living in in luxury merrick learned that no witness awre to it he did it from his standing here and throwing it in the face of offo the jury only indicated how weak he lie was in testimony bliss has said in in his opening that he ingoing is going to chow show that brady has grown from a poor man to a comparatively compari rich man but lie has made no effort to do eo so court could prove it but tho the court bould not allow it 11 wilson aben tho the court should 1 I havo allowed merrick to say BO so before tho the jury court rho the court will not interfere unless count el objects wilson the 1 tie court just interfered with mo nie without counsel objecting I 1 am ain simply answering answer answering ipg Mer merricks rieks statement in conclusion wilbon wilkon re that 04 ohp was la law F less ess it ana lian atvas it via vile on oil the tile conclusion cone of Wilf wilsons Wil sons ions address the court ck adjourned addresses tho jury tomor to morrow washington WASHING TOs aug 31 in the alar ar route trial tins this mornine Ilen hienkle kle of the counsel for fur tho the defense proceeded with hid his argument belore before ins addre to the jury he lie called the attention of the court to alip sel scheme lerne in the indictment the government had conce comedes led that branch ortho of the conspiracy which w andi in ho the indictment had been attributed to turner was not ot sustained by proof and fand lie argued argued that turner and turners lurner 8 performance were a ne Lewry part of the scheme odthe of alie indictments indict indictment mentI and th had failed as to him film it had failed as I 1 to all lie ile gave a notice that he lie n vou ld present a prayer to that effect the court inquired whether II 11 henkle en was not a little premature in in making his argument no nolle pros has lias been b cen entered as to turner nor had the jury found a verdict acquit acquitting hm him hienkle amr mr IN ferrick discharged him from the case tho the court 0 no o hienkle lile he said chatis eluira lent that lie v would ask the jury to return no verdict against turner tile mccurt turner is jr entitled to have a verdict from froin the jury that v verdict lias has not v et been i rendered and ho lie is is still on tin tr trial 1 ial and for aught tho the court can know kno A judicially the jury may find him guilty would not the proper tune time for tins this argument bo be upon tipon an all arrest of judgment Henk loMy imy object now non la is to persuade the court to instruct c tulip lie jury und find turner not guilty they dinst find the others not guilty 1 I klinkle iklo argued that turner was as essential a part of the sc scheme licille of the indictment as brady the court 1 I do not see that 11 lie did not contend that tho the indictment might have been framed so as leaving lei vint out turner completely ely but according acco iding to tho the pending indictment when the he counsel for the go government merriment said exit turner the law said exeunt klinkle then beg bejan begaii ins his address to the jury |