Show TRIAL 11 escovilla Sc aco ovilla ille objects to newspaper comments being brought drought in by wu IT U telegraph to tha the herald wasill COTON jan 23 judge porter then explained at some length tho the relations of counsel for prosecution to this case me in reply ho lie said to frequent insinuations of the prisoner and his counsel that lie porter and his associates were improperly influenced fluen ced hy by the expectation of money reward ami anti had entered into a conse conspiracy iracy to execute tho tile law and convict the prisoner the district attorneys duties arc are plain and his fils salary fixed hy by law it is simply a year and fees in certain cases case s a as prescribed hy by law guitrau shouted ilia office all told ia is worth VIM a year and yet et he lie cannot nay pay his board bills bill ile iio spends it all on wine and anti fancy women 11 judge porter adverted to hie tile constant contant 61 interruptions of prisoner his hi s false falso claims jofs of sympathy and I that the tile press rc wag was with him and afsa said i d in contradiction pm tra d sli tion I have yet to see a single american newspaper that has one word to eay say in his defense scoville Sc vainly strove to pet get the car of the court protesting that judge porter was exceeding tho the rules of the court by such statements at len length ti porter paused and scoville Sc demanded demangin deman gId that ho be be allowed to make similar statements in reply judge jud porter attempted to go on but Sv scoville ille reinforced by the clamor of the prisoner succeeded in getting the floor when with much excitement ho lie demanded that liis his rights and aie he claimed that ho he had rights should le ile respected lie he insisted that judge porter had bad no right to state what the newspapers said or what they did not say and lie desired the exception exception dul duly v noted co col corkhill insisted that counsel had boright no right to object the prisoner had been allowed to state what ho lie had received in the way of letters he ile had been permitted to read them to read extracts extrac ta from papers and to make all sorts of statements as to what tho tile american people and press were saying of him judge porter was simply contradicting these statements judge cox intimated that the p prisoner was no not t allowed to tb d do as charged bat but could not be restrained from doing so 90 scoville Sc well cant judge porter bo be restrained the judge ruled that tho the speaker M might glit contradict assertions of the kind made by the prisoner judge porter then read from printed evidence several of tb the emore more noted examples of this effort on oil the tile part vart of lie the prisoner to deceive tho the I jury ury after which ho lie desired to be exa cosed from further tj fc peaking for the day the court adjourned until tomor to mor row |