Show GUITEAU TRIAL I the desperado has bas wl well digested eallis his D delicious eli lo 10 ious christmas as dinner dr Ha cdonald manipulates the he murderous inflicting irreparable on the insanity idea it to alii hanm N I dec 27 T attic ic court was densely parked J L pon imin leaching achins le hia his beat Gnit Qui tan eau looked around ami aud paid said I had a nice christmas dinner and liopo everybody mso did I had bits lt of f fruit HUM tiou era ors and lady vii visitors tors and a g time generally ur dr A E mcdonald superintendent of tho the wards island insane hospital testified cases rases of insanity ho ile lad had given special attention lo 10 tho the haudy of insanity the witness stated tho difference din tc between tween delusions and on one c P being clu the sumeet subject L to by y judgment and nn the henses censes the latter not being eing corr correctable actable and for that reason denominated an ail insane delusion he ile also referred to illusions and hallu ballu cc ce nations gi giving viril illustrations from his bis own experience ile believed judging front experience that tile claim inspiration is frequently asserted by insane insano persons proceeding from a source of hallucination or insane delusion affecting the senses the witness wai then asked if person persons action under tinder the claim ofin spi rution would indicate indie ate under tinder any other ways than by their assertions and replied their actions and would in indicate licate it as w well ell as their to illus illustrate tto it a it per person oil clausing dai clau ning to be jesna christ and and acting under tinder an ail inspiration clothed himself like the savior gave away liis his property slept outdoors out doors doom because bemuse the savior had not where to lay jay his head the witness was asked if such persons would feel any illy apprehension of bodily injury or would take any any precautions to guard goard against danger lie ile replied inspiration always overrides all ill fear of bodily pain or injury and renders the person who believes ho be is acting under inspiration wholly oblivious to such consideration the witness was asked if such persons usually planned with de deliberation I ibera and replied on the co contrary their acta acts arc are sudden in both conception eption and ind execution as is a rule and cecy tit they sei seldom ioni attempt to avoid the in there are two kindi of insanity doctor suggested the prisoner wiio the crank insanity and the abraham in insanity the latter is these lie school bool im belonging to tell us what yoa you think of abraham doctor the witness described what is commonly conly called temporary insanity where a man commits an in act which I is only tily an evidence of insanity ity and where the person is in appearance perfectly sane in all respects both before and after the act G guiteau just my case exactly witness I do not believe in such buell insanity ansa anity and in al all my experience have never seen an histan of it corkhill doctor we ila had I a young man here from chic chicago ag an agno agnostic still who testified that one person in A every five is insane what would you bu ga say t to that tl at scoville asked to have the question read by flip the reporter and sharply rebuked the tile district attorney attorney for his persistent pere attempts to 10 injure ill j tire the character of and cast slurs I upon pon the witti cAes es fort for lie defense lef ense I do not care lio ito continued to be continually objecting to such matters lie ile may colleti continue alc tlc t to do 10 bo if lie el chooses looses we wil will I wait till we ive pet get to the jury wall jwill then suppose you wait the witness in reply to the question said jn ili lie the group of which that youtie man dan one the other four will Vill be pretty safe the the witness thought a person acting under tinder inspiration to commit certain deeds would not be deterred from tile commission of that act through any an consideration t on of personal personal harm another to person guiteau poh oh you arc are tal talking kingA about cranks now I dont belong below to that school the witness then proceeded at some I length to give the reasons for his opinion using g the expressions I bave frequently noticed that his most violent interruptions have been made when the weight of the evidence has been against him the counsel for defense objected the witness was usurping usurp hii the functions of the jury who a alone L one could pass upon tile fact favi that the evidence waa for or against the prisoner the court overruled tile objection an ex was diott tl by the de defense rense t Mui guiteau tui who had kept unusually quiet au all through h thy the mornine morning here addressed the witness speaking without a show of excitement you are making a preat great ado about nothing doctor I dont pretend I am insane insane now tell us m aliat hat yon you know about abraham get your money and go home 11 abo witness continuing clearly analyzed alio conduct and remarks of tho prisoner deriu during tile trial and concluded lie had bad bee been n playing a part ever since the first fir saday day at alio outset the prisoner lie said had directed all liis his abuse against one of the counsel afterwards ter wards against all ali of them guiteau well you oil sec see do doctor tor corkhill cori CoT khill hill has corrupted the rest of them th em evil communications you know corrupt good manners the first hypothetical question of the prosecution was read and objection made by the defense to the clause assume that lie raised an ail axe to his bis sister which act the prisoner himself denied 11 on the ground that the witness could not bo asked to pass upon a hypothetical question containing two propositions diametrically opposite after argument the court sustaining the objection the prosecution modified their question and in fit the modified form it was put to the witness lie ile reviled replied I believe the prisoner to have been cerione bane 11 objection to the question and reply was noted by the de defense rense after recess dr macdonald again took t tho 11 a buind guiteau who lad nad just taken liia his scat seat looked over to the jury and suid these experts are doing this business with a good deal of parrot like talk dr macdonald deviated somewhat from the course pursued by the rest of them it but justice to myself to eay say I did not say ay to him I had examined the tile law in relation to this matter Cork corkhill bill then read the second hypothetical question upon which guiteau commented eit passant with such expressions pres its as that is that fellow shaws lie that iball is all rubbish it is I nob odya odys business where I the money I did not kill him the doctors kc I the bitne in the affirm active assuming siAi that the facto sot set forth be true and adding it strengthens my opinion that the tile man was bane on the 2nd and of july exception to the creation and answer v was as noted by the tile defense the visited ma cited itil in the und nd examined liim on the main incidents of ins his life lift including tile abst nation whit h tho prisoner called ily inspiration tho tile wit leini eliy if alie art was gods he lie leao leive the details to the almighty ind not practice with a 11 the ncr flus lied a little and said salt the Almis lity onen leaves th detries to his up ts tho prisoner said regarding a future plans while lie aint alii ii ho lie had atwil stud iod d 11 up inanity insanity ani an i tile jury mould auls find he lie mai was ally insane on oil july 2nd and and would equit him that I lie w would go to tile insane for si t bev months that tho commission of insanity would puss pass on liis his case and find liim sane of course and die dig charse liim him the witness believed guiteau a perfectly bano sano man |