Show from saturday t jaily anavit 10 tim KJ suit gays the supreme morning at 10 present chief hunter and justice einar son the conner that lie alicd receive M faoro iuds informing them that ha could not be present nebout a week aal in adjournment journ ment for same daiy give him aclin nce to be adda bennett that in liolia lf of alie executor in th i c c f etna line A Youn gt li rt gerge Q cannon he sired ta be heard upon the motion for u judge angan in of the they were ready to argue this motion for alio writ though they believed alint alna court lind no authority in alm matter thereupon rd alie aigner by the executors and gome of the exhibit i already pub in our columns judge mcbride objected to alp right of this court to esaue a writ of and quoted a report in support of hii position lie alo stated that the it charged error contained no particular alignment of error judge quoted theOr ginio act and other to provi that the supreme court had tiou in a writ of review or and paid some attention to the aai ties cited by the opposing attorney lie claimed ni answering alic charge that no assignment of error had been made that the alfi divil fully complied with alie statute adding that upon alie application for a writ alie assignment ot errora is not necessary J L eab referring to thal opposing arguments that this court had no authority to issue writa of certiorari by original jurisdiction rem irked that it biad the right to issue lucli writs in aid of its appellate jurisdiction jie knew of no state in which the su preme courts had no authority in granting writa of certiorari judge read alie organic act where it to the establish ment and powers of each of alie various courts iio stated that this merely asked for action upon an original mattor and as such did not come under the power of this court which has recently decided that it has no original bul appellate jurisdiction A writ of nun damu brought before it in 1879 had been refused by this very court Chief justice presiding the arguments of the plain till attorneys were to the eft act t eliat the court had no jurisdiction in the matter and second that no sufficient showing of error had been made l to quoted by them and then adjourned till tomorrow to morrow afternoon at alien a decision in the case will be rendered |