| OCR Text |
Show DECISION IN CASE OF HID ESTATE IS RENDERED Juflr: A. W. Aero has Just hojldod ilown hla dooision In tho casf of L 1.. Coray, administrator of tho estate of Mary .1 All red, deceased, against tho Perry Irrigation company, in which Clnr-ence Clnr-ence Tl. Allied. James I... Allred and Millie 1 V. Kasey filod intervention, and which j has born pending in the district court for some time. j The Interveners are the children of 1 Mary J. Allred who died In 1910, and after her death Mr Coray wu appointed ! 1 administrator of her estate, and claimed that her estate was entitled to certain I water rights in the Perry Irrigation com- j pany, which had been used on about fllty acres Of land for the last thirty yea's. The Intcrvenois claimed that shortly be- fore their father iil In 1904, the lant 1 waa divided among them and deeds ex- j ecuted. and that they have occupied the j land ever since said time, and were on- j tlllde to the water with the land, as the land without the water was valueless. The court. In a very lengthy written opinion, sustains the contention of tl interveners and decides in their favor. Confirming the title to the vater in them, j and also derides in favor of the Perry Irrigation company, who declined to ismo 1 thr Water stork to either of the contest- I lng sides until decided by the court, and, ' In the decree entered. Judge Agee directs the Irrigation company to Issue errtifi-cates errtifi-cates for the water to the intervenors. I and enters costs against the administrator. |