Show I TO To ARGUE ON 0 RAil mi MERGER mm ST PAUL Minn June 12 12 Arguments will be heard heart in the d United States Slates courts court ot of appeals here re next Monday In Iho tho hu form Corm the courts court's decree shall tak take in ap- ap ap the acquisition of oC control of the tho th Central pacific P railroad by bythe bythe the Ihl Southern Pacific road under case and The courts court s action which the In Interstate In- In interstate commerce commission slon has bas authority to and ap approve ap- ap prove prose pro e this control arrangements I Is declared in m effect to hold con con- con constitutional the transportation act of oC 1920 1 21 under which extensile consolidation of or United States railroads rail rail- railroads rail railroads roads I Is planned Notification was Bas tent sent yesterday to counsel for the hearing on Juno June 18 simultaneously with Ith the tho an- an announcement an announcement that the tho court had reached Its decision d cllon o o opinion be bo filed tiled it Is said MId but It Is understood the tho court reached these general conclusions conclusion TI ACT I That the tho United States supreme court which ordered separations of the ol ds holding them in re- re restraint re restraint of oC o competition In or of the tho Ih Sherman trust anU tru t lct act did not consider con the tho transportation act acl That the Interstate commerce commission Is specifically lly rested estell v Ith authority to approve this ac ac- ac acquisition acquisition of control by the Southern Pacific under und tho the transportation act whose hose provisions the act from Crom operation o ot of th the trust Sherman trust anti la 10 has That ther there was WI no disrespect for forthe ortho the tho supreme court In the commis commis- commission's commission's sion's dons action a as the tho supreme court courts d decision was based on prior legis- legis legislation lallon lation and action Initiated before beCore the passage ge of oC the tho transportation act 1 and as the tho th commissions commission's no- no notion ac action tion was based on this later I legle- legle It was unrelated to the su- su su premo prem courts court's action TO L DECREE sot o The decre decree of th the circuit court of oC opp appeals li will b be under th the man man- mandate mandate date of th the supreme l court In the separation cas case which directs th the I circuit court of appeals to enter the mal final decree Iq iii accordance With Ith the supreme court s a andt and t the laws lass of tho the United States I Circuit Jud Judges I Walter alter H f anborn Sanborn St Paul S K Ken Ken- Kenyon yon Ken n-I n yon Fort Dodge and Robert Rebert S I Dem Denver Denvel h heard rd the case SIt ling a as tho circuit of appeals for tor the eighth judicial district |