| Show EXPECT DECREE IN RAIL CONTROVERSY I I ST PAUL Titan Minn Juno June The IThe 1 I The hearing In the Untied United States clr 1 cir cir- cir circuit cult court of appeals io h-io hl a on Il a I petition for tor ft II final decree divest I divest divest- divest tag Ing the Southern Pacific and its lis lease lello and stock 0 ow ownership control of the Central Pacific was as ex- ex ex expected lisI to bo ho concluded late toda I James f James M Beck BeeS solicitor g of the United States esterday suggested reconsideration b bi tl ti e 0 United tales States supreme court of It itt eI I mandate for tor separation of the Iho I Southern Pacific and C Central Pa- Pa Pa Pacific cit Ic to counsel for the tho railroads the th order of the Inter Inter- Interstate Interstate state commerce commission for tor consolidation of ot the two 10 1 0 loads Is 1 valid under the th pro provisions of o the tho 1920 transportation act and a n de- de decree decree d cree cree entered for such uch a n a merger should thoI be I |