Show ALIMONY CONTINUES WITH REMARRIAGE An opinion rendered b by the state supreme In an nn Ogden case holds that a remarriage does not automatically terminate a judgment for limon payable In perIodic Installments The decision came yesterday esterday In inthe inthe I the case from Ogden of ot Is ells ella Myers against J W V Myers J Mrs I Myers obtained a divorce custody or of a child and 25 5 a II month all ali alimony ali alimony mony In 1919 M Miers Myers era paid no all all- all ali alimony mon mony and his former Bite nife started proceedings to collect I In ber service berke ke of ot the summons In Oregon Myers ers also expressly retained the lima time In which to plead That sec sec- second second sec second ond act gave cave the Utah court juris juris- jurisdiction jurisdiction diction the supreme court finds Judge J N Kimball In the Ogden court held that Myers should pay alimony only tor for a a little moro more than thant t 0 months since within that time after the allow allo of ot the tho interlocutory Inter- Inter Interlocutory decree de-creo Mrs Myers re- re remarried remarried re remarried married The fact tact that this tills re- re Im all nas TV as prior to the Issuance ot of any final decree in Utah Is not considered by the tho supreme court nor is any ruling made mado as to whether hether the second marriage was as but the tho supreme court holds Judge Kimball In error when hen he terminated the alimony payments nith the second Such remarriage It Is intimated might prove proper ground for I tion to tr the court to modify the tho de- de decree de decree cree but until the judgment Is modified It stands regardless of the tho remarriage 00 00 IsI I |